Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
Apparently, the PLO charter issue is a political football. Peres was Prime Minister of Israel in April 1996 when the PNC met to cancel the offending passages from the charter. From Wither the PLO charter?:

The Covenant, in which critics say 30 of 33 provisions in one way or another call for the eradication of the Zionist state, is as much symbolic as substantive. Arafat contends the offensive passages were canceled by the Palestinian National Council in its April 24, 1996, meeting, and the American and Israeli governments agreed at that time. But Netanyahu and his supporters reject that.

63 posted on 12/13/2001 11:50:47 AM PST by ThreeOfSeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: ThreeOfSeven
Arafat contends the offensive passages were canceled by the Palestinian National Council in its April 24, 1996, meeting

Arafat is a liar - the PNC only passed a resolution to set up a committee to recommend changes. That's as far as it got. Certainly the special meeting, as stipulated in the Charter itself, called specifically to make any changes has NEVER been held.

The Charter as currently published at the PLO website and that of the PA is UNCHANGED.

74 posted on 12/13/2001 9:48:17 PM PST by anapikoros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: ThreeOfSeven; anapikoros
The Covenant, in which critics say 30 of 33 provisions in one way or another call for the eradication of the Zionist state, is as much symbolic as substantive. Arafat contends the offensive passages were canceled by the Palestinian National Council in its April 24, 1996, meeting, and the American and Israeli governments agreed at that time. But Netanyahu and his supporters reject that.

I fear we're beating this to death. The Charter itself is clear:
Article 33: This Charter shall not be amended save by [vote of] a majority of two-thirds of the total membership of the National Congress of the Palestine Liberation Organization [taken] at a special session convened for that purpose.

This special session has never been called, much less a vote taken. It doesn't matter what Peres, Arafat, or Clinton say. It's never been amended and stands as written. It’s as though the mayors of Chicago, LA, New York, and DC got together and repealed the 2nd amendment. Then Clinton, Reno and a dozen assorted governors accepted it. It didn’t happen, nothing was amended.

As to why the session hasn't been convened, many think it's to give the PLO's future actions deniability. And a 2/3 vote to accept Israel wasn't achievable in 93 or in 95, certainly not now.

75 posted on 12/14/2001 6:42:06 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson