To: Billthedrill
I am straight. There is no doubt. The article's title is a bit misleading; more properly, it should say that we're being inculcated into the idea that such alternative lifestyles are OK, and that heterosexual relationships are not.
I believe that straight is good, alternative is unacceptable.
To: FoundationAndEmpire
It'll be THUPER......we can have tea parties, make little doilies, and start school chapters of GSA and NAMBLA!!! Oh, so faaaaabulous.... </sarcasm off>
To: FoundationAndEmpire
alternative is unacceptable. To Bible thumpers. No one else cares. This battle is lost, as was the battle against evolution, as was the battle against the earth centered universe, as was the battle against the spherical earth.
The "science" of the Bible was that of ignorant goatherders. Enlightenment moves on -- Talibans wither and die.
23 posted on
12/11/2001 7:56:11 PM PST by
jlogajan
To: FoundationAndEmpire
There's where we differ. I believe that "alternative lifestyles" - boy, they really do have you talking the talk, don't they? - I believe that sleeping with the same sex is sad, and sterile, and ultimately self-defeating, but if they can take some human comfort in it let them be. Please don't be worried about this - the sex drive is stronger than propaganda, trust me on this one. Boys like girls, and girls like boys, men like women, and women like men. That's how it is, and nobody with a microphone or a word processor is going to change it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson