Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomB
"Face it, none of those links say ANYTHING CLOSE to what you claim they do."

Let's FACE IT TOGETHER--- If you read (red) all these links, starting with the Gov't link, there is NO WAY anyone, with a fairly average IQ could not not see that the US (and Russia) was involved in the war against the TALIBON as far back as early February.

The gov't site shows CLEARLY the discussion of oil in the area and how the problems in Afganistan would get in the way.
I will do the math for you , since you can't do it, with the times mentioned in the articles. Although you are correct concerning a precise mention of the word OCTOBER, one could have someone in high school or even grade school read these articles and come to the conclusion that the US WAS involved there as far back as Feb. and was talking of "limited military action" if negotiations broke down.

I had assumed that the lack of reasoning was limited to the Democrats but obviously at FR has its' share also.

Also, being I put it, up I do share with the claims from where I got it Which is here "If I were the Government."

And thanks to the media and gov't all the sheeple (including me) knew nothing about it, or maybe you did and that's the reason you don't want to admit to what's in the articles.

71 posted on 12/12/2001 1:39:38 PM PST by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: It'salmosttolate; Timesink; detsaoT; sanchmo; SW6906; big gray tabby
I had assumed that the lack of reasoning was limited to the Democrats but obviously at FR has its' share also.

You are confusing a "lack of reasoning" with a lack of "imagination.

Because you have to have an almost child-like imagination to read those articles and think of them as you do.

, there is NO WAY anyone, with a fairly average IQ could not not see that the US (and Russia) was involved in the war against the TALIBON as far back as early February.

And which one of your claims is this an explaination of? That we "told India that we would be invading Afghanistan in October"? That is has been "Ten months since Jane's Defense got word of the planned invasion of Afghanistan"?

I'm still waiting for you to substantiate the EXACT CLAIMS you made. Which this feeble attempt doesn't come close to doing.

The gov't site shows CLEARLY the discussion of oil in the area and how the problems in Afganistan would get in the way.

NO KIDDING! A murderous regieme unrecognized by almost the entire civilized world making the prospect of building a pipeling difficult.

That, however, is a far cry from your dishonest and misleading statement:

three years since Congress discussed removing the government of Afghanistan to make way for an oil pipeline

Frankly, the fringe nuts like you who have to completely invent incidences to support your insane notions, including the implication that the government was somehow involved with the 9/11 attacks, make me want to vomit.

75 posted on 12/12/2001 2:44:38 PM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson