Classic 'rubbishing' article. The author is 'selective' in what simplified argument he chooses to refute and to whom, not even bothering to address the more sophisticated arguments in which oil (or more precisely ENERGY) plays a
significant and variable factor. Now how many oilmen are there in the Administration???
Still, who needs to go into details when we know what is true and what is false?
VRN
You might want to read the replies and get familiar with the discussion next time before you jump in with your opinion.
Just a little helpful advice....