Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: *crevo_list
Bump.
2 posted on 12/10/2001 6:55:01 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
>>Sorry. The word "woodpecker" is simply far to complex to develop
>>naturaly, as has been PROVED to you many times before.
>>Learn the model, Lingui-babbler. Instead of showwing you're own
>>ingorance.

>>Besides, no one has shown yet how a complete language could come from
>> a dead gaggle of GRUNTS.


I must say, this is a perfect parody of 'karl' who constantly harps on about "Evo-babblers" never being able to prove that we all came from a "dead puddle of GUE!" (even after being told several thousand times that the correct spelling is "goo" and that evolution makes no such claims).

Rather amusing. Not a logical argument (it's simply argument by ridicule), but it is an effective and accurate satire of many evolution debates I've seen on USENET.
5 posted on 12/10/2001 7:29:23 AM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson