Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LadyDoc
I don't doubt the child was unwanted. It's just not the place of the reporter to read an unknown, unidentified person's mind. It's the fact that the child was abandoned that implies he was unwanted, not the fact that the cord was still attached, though. Just a journalistic gripe from a newspaper reporter.
7 posted on 12/09/2001 10:15:40 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: mountaineer
You're right. It was the subtle "hint hint" that since this kid was killed, we should allow "choice" i.e. for moms to kill a million kids a year with abortions.
8 posted on 12/09/2001 10:20:00 AM PST by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: mountaineer
I can see why the reporter wrote this, if the mother wanted the baby, she wouldn't have thrown him in the garbage, if someone else took the baby and killed him and threw him in the garbage, the mother would have reported a kidnapping. A wanted loved baby would have had a funeral and respectful burial of some kind. It sounds like another woman too lazy to use birth control and even too lazy to get an abortion.
9 posted on 12/09/2001 10:20:33 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson