To: liliana
Clinton didn't have authority from Congress to limit her term. The simple clear language says her term SHALL be 6 years.
Remember the Florida elections where we argued the Rats argued that Shall means May. We are doing the same thing here.
To: VRWC_minion
Would you care to state the PROOF that somebody appointed to fulfill another's term gets six years? I'm not talking about NEW appointee; I am talking about somebody appointed to serve OUT a time, which is clearly what is done in this circumstances in every other committee this government has.
Would you care to explain what Ms. Wilson is the exception to every rule?
And would you answer my question about the Kennedy Center? Or doesn't that fit in with your agenda here this week?
102 posted on
12/08/2001 2:20:52 PM PST by
Howlin
To: VRWC_minion
Clinton didn't have authority from Congress to limit her term. I'm having trouble here understanding what you mean. Exactly where is it written that appointees to commissions and committees will have entirely new terms, and that no appointments will be made to fill terms of those who leave for any reason.
I'd like a CLEAR cite on that.......no your "reading" or "interpretation."
What I'm trying to figure out here is why you, and only you, believe Berry has a leg to stand on. BTW, Mort Kondracke and Fred Barnes just said on The Beltway Boys that she is dead wrong; what do YOU think they are wrong?
103 posted on
12/08/2001 2:23:31 PM PST by
Howlin
To: VRWC_minion
we agree to disagree and that's fine, at least we're part of the VRWC which i joined when hillary founded it on the today show.
138 posted on
12/09/2001 4:14:55 AM PST by
liliana
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson