Ok, I will back down here. I don't know enough about other precedents or the history of this particular law to make a true assessment if I think she has a strong case. For all I know a similar challenge was already made and the SC rules against her interpretation.
My point has been from the outset that this lady's posistion is not totally without merit which is where everyone on FR has started with their opinion.
I didn't like what I read when I read the actual wording of the law and I have to say her argument soes have merit (If I "said strong case" then I was clearly overstating my case), sorry.
Well, since you've admitted that you haven't heard any of the legal talking heads on TV discussing this, I'll tell you what they all, to a person, say: she has NO chance, i.e., merit, if you will.