The preliminary evidence here at least rules out the conclusion that there is absolutely nothing to the find -- especially when you read the background info about the pre-Columbian inscriptions that appear to be on the stones.
Too true. No need to go back 6000 years for that. Most people can't remember/agree/accept anything but the PC version of history from 200 years ago.
Enjoyed the article and links. Bookmarked. Thanks.
For a REAL good read ... try Velikovsky's "Worlds in Collision" and "Earth in Upheaval". These two books (+ 'Ages in Chaos') turned the scientific world on its ear back in the 50's. He was hounded for going outside the circle, but now a good deal of his theory is accepted/proven (credidted to others).
So also do the quite professional scientists. Like everyone, each have their own set of faults. I'm not disagreeing with you. Only adding a comment.
It would be nice if more people exercised a bit of open mindedness like you. It doesn't mean they have to give up their belief system. It only means that they recognize the possibility of alternate possibilities.