Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Woman Sues Va. to Allow Adoption
The Washington (Com)Post ^ | December 6, 2001 | Brooke A. Masters

Posted on 12/06/2001 1:28:32 PM PST by FormerLib

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:36 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Arlington Resident Applying for D.C. Foster Child Has Waited Two Years.

An Episcopal priest asked an Arlington court yesterday to force Virginia to allow her to adopt a foster child from the District, contending that the state is stalling on her application because she is a lesbian.

Click on source for the full article.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christianlist; homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: Jester99
Number one, I'm not gay. I just think people that are minding their business should be left alone.
Number two, I disagree with gays being allowed to adopt children.
Number three, your an idiot and a bigot.
Number four, most people that are as obsessed with homosexuals as you are, are latent homosexuals, trying to cover up. Poofs, hiding behind the Bible.
21 posted on 12/07/2001 2:14:33 AM PST by Jaxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Jester99
"Do you, or do you not agree with the Lord's command to charge homosexuals with the death penalty?"

I'm all for it. Death penalty sounds good to me.

23 posted on 12/07/2001 4:32:18 AM PST by gcraig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Jester99
Wrong Here are the two verses 22 and 23

"`Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. 23 Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.

26 posted on 12/07/2001 4:58:44 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Adoption and family in the name of a personal skin color preference or sex preference has never been legaly recognized and I hope we are going to backtrack on that facist tendency.
27 posted on 12/07/2001 5:01:04 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: FF578
I disagree. The puritan example of society should be the one that we follow.

I'm sorry, but I have to stick to the Christian one.

29 posted on 12/07/2001 5:12:15 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Enablers of Homosexual Child Abuse


30 posted on 12/07/2001 5:14:04 AM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Scary how silly the people out west can be to see this agenda as if it was innocent and sexualy unintending towards children.
31 posted on 12/07/2001 5:18:15 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jester99
Why do 'Christians' always conveniently leave off the rest of the verse?

Because that part no longer applies to Christians. Jesus was very clear that the punishment was God's to apply, not ours. That's what the story about the adulterous woman was all about, the one He told "Now go and sin no more."

32 posted on 12/07/2001 5:21:28 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Giving children to homosexuals is child abuse. (cut from another post, but I agree completely.)

Why should we allow perverted people to raise chilren?

We need to raise children is a "normal" "healthy" home. Two parents, one male, one female, God loving home!

33 posted on 12/07/2001 5:22:16 AM PST by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
...most people that are as obsessed with homosexuals as you are, are latent homosexuals, trying to cover up.

Careful, that's widely known as a tactic used by the pro-homo cheerleaders here on Free Republic. They often miss the point that, by using homosexuality as a smear, they are admitting that there is just something wrong with homosexuality.

34 posted on 12/07/2001 5:24:32 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
An Episcopal priest asked an Arlington court yesterday to force Virginia to allow her to adopt a foster child from the District, contending that the state is stalling on her application because she is a lesbian.

Right. Move on - she's a lesbian, Episcopal "priest" who preaches "part-time". She is a no-time, never-time priest. She's a fraud.

35 posted on 12/07/2001 5:26:08 AM PST by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotTheDevil
Therefore, be it resolved: homosexual = Nazi. We must conclude that homosexuals intend to persecute, murder, and torture members of the opposite sex.

I always wonder how the liberals can see one form of racism as being benign and another form of racism as being horrible. Racism is racism and homos are racist. You are not going to make one believe otherwise.

Therefore, be it resolved: racial uniformity = Nazi. We must conclude that members of the racialy uniform couples intend to persecute, murder, and torture members of the opposite race.

Yes indeed. You cannot marry for a sexual preference. You marry to protect a procreative and economic institution. Anyone getting along with someone centraly because they have particular sexual feature are sick.

It is not funny eccentricity, it is a mandate in the name of this eccentricity.

If someone can govern themselves and their marriage in discriminatorial ways based on the shape or sex of the kid or whatever, it's sick, same thing with those claiming love in the name of a skin or sexual preference. That is not love, that is sick obsession over purely abject physical features.

Remember, it is in sickness or in health, not in sexual preference. There is an undeniable facist tendency amongst homosexual as there is an undeniable facist tendency amongst racists. It may not make them Nazies, but sorry, I am not the one who equaled racism with Nazism, liberals did, and I am using their standard.

36 posted on 12/07/2001 5:28:33 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter
Number one, I'm not gay. I just think people that are minding their business should be left alone.

Ah, but the homosexuals aren't just "minding their business."  They have viciously attacked the Boy Scouts of America and now the Salvation Army.

America's Fifth Column ... watch PBS documentary JIHAD! In America
Download 8 Mb zip file here (50 minute video)

37 posted on 12/07/2001 5:28:58 AM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NotTheDevil
So, are you suggesting that the State of Virginia inquire into exactly which sexual acts this woman engages in?

Remember that she's the one who raised the issue by stating that she was a lesbian, thereby making it the state's business. If someone went in and stated they were a drug user, it would be appropriate for the state to determine if illegal drugs were being used. It would also be appropriate for the state to refuse to place an innocent into the home of the drug user until that was known.

And since the law applies equally to heterosexuals, regardless of marital status, don't you think all applicants for adoption should undergo extensive investigation to determine whether their marriage beds are the site of this "crime against nature"?

Only if the couple first did something to suggest that such crimes were a common aspect of their household, as the woman did by admitting she was a sexual deviant.

Where is proof that this woman has broken the law?

She has declared her intent. To supply the proof that you suggest, the state would have to put her and her home under 24-hour surveillance. Better to just keep the innocent child out of her control.

38 posted on 12/07/2001 5:29:45 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NotTheDevil
If any person carnally knows in any manner any brute animal...

My ex-brother-in-law was a brute animal.  Does that mean my sister is in trouble with the law?

America's Fifth Column ... watch PBS documentary JIHAD! In America
Download 8 Mb zip file here (50 minute video)

39 posted on 12/07/2001 5:32:17 AM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jester99
I noticed, Jester99, that in your post you continually took the "o" out of God's name.......Has His name , all by itself , with none of the D-words following, to you, become a curse word?
40 posted on 12/07/2001 5:33:38 AM PST by 4mycountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson