The Washington Post reported Tuesday that an unofficial agent of the terrorist regime of Sudan, after giving the DNC over $500,000, gained access to the Clinton Administration in order to ease our country's hard-line policy towards Sudan. And it looks like he succeeded.
The Post story, reported by David B. Ottaway, details how businessman Mansoor Ijaz parlayed $525,000 in contributions, including $200,000 raised with Al Gore at Ijaz's New York penthouse into unusual access to White House and State Department officials. Ijaz manages a $2.7 billion investment portfolio, much of which is for Arab governments. Ijaz is keen on helping Sudan exploit its oil reserves, enabling the regime to join the ranks of oil exporting countries.
The problem is the U.S. State Department considers the Sudanese government a supporter of international terrorism. Egypt, an American ally, has threatened to go to war with Sudan because of the regime's support for Egyptian Islamic terrorists, notably their attempt on Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's life. The radical Islamic Sudanese government is also infamous for its oppression of Christians and its tolerance of slavery. Yes, slavery.
One would think a regime such as Sudan's would have trouble getting heard by any Western country, let alone the United States. But with the Clinton Administration, money talks and the tyrants of Khartoum (Sudan's capital) bought itself, however indirectly, easy access to the highest reaches of our nation's government. Since July, 1996, Ijaz traveled to Sudan at least six times, meeting repeatedly with Sudan's president, Lt. Gen. Omar Hassan Bashir, and the country's militant Islamic leader, Hassan Turabi, advising them on how to soften the Clinton administration's position." Turabi, the guiding force of Sudan, is a Sudanese version of the late Ayatollah Khomeni.
Turabi's agent of influence also met with Bill and Hillary, and senior White House and State Department officials, including Sandy Berger, the current national security adviser. Ijaz was quite blunt with The Post about what his donations bought him -- he talks of the "political prominence" and "access" gained by donations and fundraising.
Last spring and summer, Ijaz was most concerned about a law passed by Congress banning all financial transactions between U.S. companies and Sudan. Ijaz admits that such a ban would have hurt his business. His first trip to Sudan coincided with the deliberations of Clinton Administration officials on how to implement the ban.
As The Post reports: "When the regulations were published in late August, the administration effectively gutted the prohibition by allowing a broad range of financial transactions by U.S. businesses dealing with Sudan. That loose interpretation remains in effect despite sharp protests from some members of Congress." August, by the way, was the same month that Ijaz met with Berger.
Administration officials coyly told The Post that Ijaz didn't have any particular impact, but lauded his lobbying nevertheless. "'We have not found his analysis on Sudan compelling in any way,' said David Johnson, a White House spokesman, who added that Ijaz 'had provided a valuable perspective.'" Not compelling, but valuable. The Clinton gang disinformation team must be getting a bit rusty, they usually don't contradict themselves in the same sentence.
We still don't know what Ijaz and Bill Clinton discussed among themselves during the dozen or so times they met with each other. Though we should remember Clinton has made it the habit of conducting foreign policy through his fundraisers. He discussed Asian policy in the Oval Office with James Riady, the Indonesian magnate who backed his political campaigns with over $3 million in loans and contributions. Clinton also used Johnny Chung, another Clinton funder who shuttled Chinese government officials through the Oval Office, to go to China and negotiate for the release of Harry Wu, the human rights activist. It stands to reason that Ijaz and Clinton discussed the interests of the Sudanese regime, those discussions only taking place because of the cold cash Ijaz gave Clinton.
Though it seems Ijaz has the financial wherewithal to have made the contributions attributed to him, it will be a fair use of investigative resources to find out if he was "reimbursed" for by the Sudanese potentates for his contributions to Clinton or for his lobbying. Ijaz was not registered as a foreign agent with the State Department, which he should have done, having clearly acted as lobbyist for the Sudanese regime.
We also want to know what the State Department and National Security staffers knew about Ijaz's background. How is it that a businessman with ties to one of the world's outlaw regimes gets a meeting with top policy officials at the White House and State Department? Was Sandy Berger aware of Ijaz's support for the Democratic National Committee? Is it appropriate, let alone lawful, for top foreign policy-making officials to give access to foreign agents based on their Democratic donation history?
Berger and Nancy Soderberg, another National Security staffer, made it a habit of attending fundraising events in the White House (illegal) and elsewhere (improper). The White House foreign affairs team was acutely aware of Clinton's foreign fundraising efforts. One staffer called Johnny Chung a "hustler" and yet the President continued to see him. Nancy Soderberg herself got into a tiff with DNC Chairman Don Fowler, who used the CIA to override national security staff concerns about giving White House access to a foreign businessman wanted by Interpol. Our nation's foreign policy and national security apparatus, from the Oval Office on down, was compromised by the fanatic effort to raise cash for Clinton's political machine.
Ijaz wanted to ease the impending restrictions on his business contacts with the terrorist regime in Sudan. He anted up over one-half million dollars in Clinton cash. He got his meetings with Clinton, Gore and other top government officials. The restrictions were eased and the terrorists in Sudan are better off. Policy offered, policy bought, policy sold. That will good news to the victims of Sudan's next terrorist action.
Who knows, maybe the networks will cover this story in a few months
Why don't you just give us the highlights.
If anyone is interested and I can't imagine anyone that isn't,do a google search on Mansoor Ijaz.He is more than just an ivestment banker and a nuclear physicist.Somebody let the political dogs out and they got their nose to the ground.
If anyone is interested and I can't imagine anyone that isn't,do a google search on Mansoor Ijaz.He is more than just an ivestment banker and a nuclear physicist.Somebody let the political dogs out and they got their nose to the ground.