[jackbill]

I saw this. What an arrogant piece of garbage that Berry is.

I need to do some research to see if the President can throw her rotten A$$ off of the commission. It sure seems that this kind of act could be considered "sufficient cause".

BTW, the previous person died.

Even Mara Liasson admitted that the President was going to win on this one but I think a win should be defined as getting rid of Berry once and for all. And I wish there was some way to get that other black lawyer from Harvard off as well. They are both garbage.

[Illbay]

The question becomes: Does the USCRC Chairman serve at the pleasure of the President?

IF so, the next question then is: Is it politically wise to can her?

And lastly--going WAY out on a limb--why do we need a U.S. Civil Rights Commission, and why can't we just abolish it by the House ceasing to fund it?

(N.B. I don't understand why the GOP Congress has not made use of this tactic: Instead of ABOLISHING something like the Dept. of Education, which it is IMPOSSIBLE politically to do, why not simply pass a budget that neglects to fund these travesties?)

[N00dleN0gg1n]

Even Mara Liasson admitted that the President was going to win on this one but I think a win should be defined as getting rid of Berry once and for all.

No, a win would be abolishing the commission.

[Abn1508]

I think she should be impeached and if she continues in this vein she probably will be.

[yoe]

Are these two Clinton appointees?

I agree that Bush ought to get rid of them, terms or no terms to finish. This is the disruptive liberal activist we don't need. Hillary's hands in here somewhere?

[bimbo]

The Commission became a legal arm of the DNC under Clinton ... is it any wonder that Berry does not want a Bush appointee seated?

There's more than seating an appointee at play here ... if Bush fails to restore the INTEGRITY and PURPOSE of the Commission, he may as well allow Clinton to appoint someone.