Apparently, it depends.
Waagner recently threatened to kill 42 clinic workers unless they promise to leave the business. He is quoted as saying:
"I'm going to stop them. I've already stopped a bunch and I'm going to stop more. . . . I know I can't kill them all. But I have a list of 42 and this is to that 42: I know where you live; I know what you drive; I actually don't know all your names, but I've got your car license and I've followed you home, so I've got your street address."
Waagner also took credit for a rash of fake anthrax letters sent to family-planning clinics in October.
If a Muslim had done this, many of those pooh-poohing this man's actions would be frothing at the mouth and screaming for the death penalty, an end to immigration, etc., etc. But then again, no one ever accused the far-right of consistency, or integrity.
Oh, I dunno. What do you consider "far-right"?
Does your definition encompass only the odd-murderous nutcase?
Or does it include a somewhat larger subset of, say, principled conservatives?
Of course you're under no obligation to answer. I'm just curious, because railing against the "far right" seems to be the only thing that motivates you to post.