[Demidog]

The shoe fits. And I wouldn't talk about ad hominem if I were you. You've proven that you haven't bothered to read this article. Thus I don't believe you at all when you claim that other articles didn't say that.

[nopardons]

Aaawwwwwwww doggy, doggy, doggy; I read the article o FR, I also quickly looked at it again, at home, in the actual newspaper, delivered to my house ! It STILL does NOT say that the creepy kid was NOT fighting ; it only says that he was running away from Kabul.

Now, be a good doggy, and go read what the Constitutions says is SEDITION.

Oh , and just WHY is it that you don't think that this creepy kid is guilty of doing anything wrong ? Because you don't REALLY know what is in the CONSTITUTION, nor what thelaws of the land are ? Could that be it ? Oh, and BTW, an American citizen, who goes to another country, and fights in a civil war there ( even if it is NOT against the USA ! ) is breaking the law of this nation. Perhaps you need to also look into what happened to some, who went to Spain, in the 1930's, and fought there. LOL Poor doggy, you have vacant holes instead of info.