Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"It" Gets Around (Segway/Ginger)
ABC News ^ | 12/3/01 | Antonio Mora

Posted on 12/03/2001 4:17:56 PM PST by spycatcher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-236 next last
To: Don Joe; leadhead
Amazingly this only uses NiMH batteries right now. I imagine in the next few years they'll evaluate other types that are being developed like Lithium-metal-sulfide or Lithium-Sulfer dioxide

"The United States Advanced Battery Consortium has a budget of $260 million dollars focused on the development of new battery technologies such as Lithium-Iron Disulfide, Sodium-Sulfer, Lithium-Polymer, and Lithium-Iron."

There's even batteries you can print out on paper: Power Paper

161 posted on 12/03/2001 11:57:10 PM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
"There's even batteries you can print out on paper: Power Paper"

From the article:

"And unlike conventional battery electrolytes, the Power Paper creation is environmentally safe and doesn't require a hard metal case typical in ordinary dry-cell batteries."

I wonder if Polaroid might go after them? The "Polapulse" technology has been around for quite a while, and this stuff looks very similar to it from what I can read in that article.

162 posted on 12/04/2001 1:12:53 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
I understand the asparagus picking problem. And, I studied the guy's combination of knives and rubber bands and provisions for the mounded planting style.

But, he was on the Mark III version of his invention that would do umpdedump acres a day. At that point he had spent over $300,000 in development costs (this was in 1968-real money then). When I researched the acreage of asparagus versus his stated capacity, there was a market for about six machines on the whole West Coast.

Hardly the market to spend so much in development, support marketing costs, etc.

But, being the pleasant and aimiable guy that I am, I went to the first field trial of Mark III and watched for an hour as it chopped,destroyed and made mush of a couple acres of expensive veggies.

His only comment was that the Mark IV would perform better!

163 posted on 12/04/2001 1:36:46 AM PST by leadhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
OLD PEOPLE are going to love this.

So, it is a $3,000 walker. Still very limited use having little or no societal impact.

164 posted on 12/04/2001 4:36:24 AM PST by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Voltage
"For example the claim that you can't fall of because it balances itself. That balancing system consumes energy, which must come from the battery. And it will consume a lot, as the torque the rider will apply to the axle will be huge."

Yes, it consumes energy in keeping you constantly balanced. It seems that it corrects any overbalancing before it goes too far, requiring lots of torque to correct. I'm sure the 15 miles is a straight line number. Include bad balance, rough terrain and hills, and it will probably go down.

Since it appears to be for local commuting where recharging is always easily available, battery life probably won't be a problem. I'd expect to see longer life fuel cell or micro-turbine powered versions in the future if battery life starts to be a problem.

"In addition to be inefficient, it will also be dangerous."

First time users step on and ride and don't fall off with basically no instructions except for "do it." It sounds much safer than a bicycle.

My only worry is the weight, since there will be places you'll want or need to pick it up and carry it.

165 posted on 12/04/2001 5:04:19 AM PST by Quila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
Two wheels provide more stability than three wheels.

Huh? You can't tip over something with three (non-colinear) wheels, short of bodily lifting it off the ground.

166 posted on 12/04/2001 5:09:37 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: leadhead
"His only comment was that the Mark IV would perform better!"

$300,000 of OPM, I presume? :)

(If I ever do come up with something I'm confident will work, I'll build a prototype using scrap metal, used/surplus motors, some homebrew sensors, a "BASIC Stamp" controller, and roll my own firmware. It shouldn't cost me more than a couple hundred bucks, and I'll be using my own money.)

167 posted on 12/04/2001 5:10:15 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
The only way that this can work in practice is for the "rider" to expend as much energy "rocking" the device as it would require to walk or run the same distance while the mini-battery supplies the power to balance this silly, wheeled "pogo stick"; I hope the people who have committed to purchase this have the good sense to demand guarantees of performance.

So the Old Professer is into the new school of spouting off about things which he was too lazy or thought too beneath himself to research. :)  Electric motors move the Segway, not rocking. I realize that neither of my explanations may be right as to why you got it wrong. So I'll let you tell us why you got it wrong.

168 posted on 12/04/2001 5:11:43 AM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
Those asparagus fields are still there, and if they can be economically harvested, a lot of farmers will be able to once again make decent livings.

Until all that asparagus drives the price through the floor.

169 posted on 12/04/2001 5:13:33 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
And bicycle couriers.
170 posted on 12/04/2001 5:14:14 AM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man
Then it will be, "max speed 3 MPH forwards, 25 MPH backwards."

That should sew up the French market.

171 posted on 12/04/2001 5:15:02 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
This thing is a lemon. We already have a variety of "people movers" with wheels. We have bicycles, we have tricycles, we have scooters, we have mopeds, motor cycles and cars. We have golf carts.

Add to this list, a scooter that doesn't let you fall off.

Big deal.

172 posted on 12/04/2001 5:19:26 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
*SPLUD*

That's the sound of a lead balloon going over, which is all that this device amounts to. Come to think of it...*SPLUD* is the same sound that some fatso's rump is going to make on the pavement once this thing's battery cuts out.

173 posted on 12/04/2001 5:28:44 AM PST by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Outraged At FLA
I think the guy who has a patent on the "Hand Truck" might have something to say about this

LOL What do you suppose he'd say? I seriously doubt that after seeing a Segway and then reading how it works on the Segway Web site he would even bother looking at the patents. That is, unless he was dishonest and wanted to steal from the Segway patent.

Yep, those innovators all a bunch of thieves and lowlifes. <\sarcasm>

174 posted on 12/04/2001 5:29:06 AM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
"Huh? You can't tip over something with three (non-colinear) wheels, short of bodily lifting it off the ground."

Correct. Unless you're moving. (And BTW, the ability to move is generally considered to be a major "plus" for a vehicle.)

Then, acceleration, deceleration, and turning become a question of when it will fall over, not if. Give it enough sideways (or forward or reverse) force, and it will fall over, guaranteed.

Not so with a two-wheel device, presuming adequate tire traction. And the traction issue is one more thing that favors a two-wheeled vehicle, but mitigates against a more-than-two wheeled vehicle -- the better the traction, the less force it will take to topple it.

A two-wheeled vehicle has greater stability because its effective center of gravity is below ground level.

This scooter has the same type stability as a motorcycle or bicycle, but it has it in in the linear aspect rather than while turning.

It can't fall over when it stops, because the way it stops is by "banking" to the rear, and digging in with the tires. The harder it stops, the more it "banks". If you're riding it, and execute a hard stop, you'll lean back, but if you close your eyes, you'll feel like you're in a "down elevator" that's coming to a stop. You'll feel increased weight on the bottoms of your feet, but nothing pushing you either forward or backard. As it slows down, it'll gradually decrease the back-leaning angle, until it comes to rest with you standing straight up.

Where it won't have a whole lot of stability is in high-speed turns. That's because it can't lean/bank into a turn, due to its wheels being parallel.

If he comes out with a one-wheel version, it'll be highly maneuverable, because in addition to leaning into starts and stops, it'll be able to lean into a turn, so you won't have to slow down to turn. You'll lose low speed maneuverability, but what you gain in high speed handling will be impressive. (And I expect it's just a matter of time before he comes out with a one-wheel version, since he shows it in his patent filings.)

175 posted on 12/04/2001 5:29:21 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
"Until all that asparagus drives the price through the floor."

I don't think you understand asparagus farming, or Clintonian politics.

First, there won't be any more asparagus harvested with an automated picker than there is when it's harvested by migrants. The crowns don't know or care who or what is picking the spears. The picking starts in the spring, and continues for six weeks. The same amount of asparagus will be harvested using either technique.

Right now, the price is "through the floor", but it has nothing to do with the quantity of asparagus. The price is "through the floor" because NAFTA and Clinton created a situation where third world & Chinese asparagus -- produced at by people who work for slave wages and/or by operations that are subsidized by their governments -- are coming into the USA unimpeded, and selling below the cost of production for American farmers.

I don't know if you're a "free market/Libertarian" sort, and in any event I am not inclined to get into a urinating match over that topic. Suffice it to say that my position is that if we allow our country to fall into a state in which it is unable to feed itself, because cheap foreign imported agriculture has driven American farmers off the land, we are basically finished as a nation, because it's just a question of time before one or more of those other countries decides to blackmail us, at which point we either obey, or starve. And apart from that, I think it's plain stupid to export American jobs and dollars to other countries, with the only domestic "benefit" being a few fat-walleted brokers and traders who manage to skim some money off the top as it's making its way to China.

176 posted on 12/04/2001 5:44:23 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
"*SPLUD*

"That's the sound of a lead balloon going over, which is all that this device amounts to. Come to think of it...*SPLUD* is the same sound that some fatso's rump is going to make on the pavement once this thing's battery cuts out."

You seem to be personally vested in needing to have this product fail. As I said earlier, I find it curious that so many people are so bitter about this. It's really remarkable to watch people get so bent out of shape. This goes way beyond the "Get a horse!" contingent. This is like "Get a horse and FOAD, MF!" Too strange for words.

Me, I'd gladly use one if I could get my hands on it. I don't know what kind of health you have, but mine is rotten, and I gotta tell you that sitting around the house -- because your bones and heart don't lend themselves to walking for more than a few feet -- kinda gets old after a while. And yeah, I can ride in a car. Isn't that special. I can't walk down the road to my pond, I can't do a lot of things that other people take for granted, and frankly, I don't give a R'sA over someone's idea that a device that could make my life a whole lot better is a joke.

177 posted on 12/04/2001 5:50:42 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
Its high price will severely cut down on its potential success. At $750 - $1200 it would be a great alternative to a bicycle.

Kamen is too used to selling medical devices where price is no object. Three grand will buy a nice used motorcycle.

This isn't directed at you specifically, rather, at a whole segment of people. I'm dismayed that so many people don't understand basic research and development, economies of scale and recouping investment. Research and development cost money (in the red). A high starting price is meant to recoup the cost as quickly as feasibly possible (to get into the black). That's exactly why the latest, greatest, fastest CPUs (central processing unit) in PCs (personal computer) cost so much more than it's predecessor. Anybody that has done research before buying their second computer should know that. As demand increases to a certain level, economies of scale are met and the price comes down.

Plus, there's technology advances that give the item more value while keeping the same price. PCs are excellent examples of that. The computer power that a thousand dollars buys today cost a million dollars fifteen years ago.

VCRs entered the market at about a thousand dollars. In six years they were selling for around $250 and the technology had improved. Ditto for pocket calculators and Internet access. The cost for Internet access has only dropped a little but in the past eight years the modem speed has quadrupled. Four times more for the same amount of money. When we consider broad band, the price has doubled while the bandwidth has increased two-hundred fold.

178 posted on 12/04/2001 6:00:42 AM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Traction
The moped industry was destroyed by these laws and I don't see how this device can circumvent them.

I agree. Hmm. Maybe Segway (synonymous with segue) is that its continuation will be the straw that breaks the camel's back. IOW, maybe people will wake up and see that a bloated government destroys more values than it produces.

179 posted on 12/04/2001 6:08:40 AM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Zon
It like PCs -- I remember when they cost about $3000 and didn't really do all that much. Now, I can get a pretty good one for $700 and a loaded-to-the-gills one for $3000 (in nominal dollars -- the early computers were closer to $6000 in 2001 dollars).
180 posted on 12/04/2001 6:14:53 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson