Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
A suicide is rightful if it harms no others in comparison to the pain to self the suicide seeks to stop

Nice in practice, but we're still faced with the fact that 9 out of 10 suicides would have to be thought of as not capable of evaluating the rightfulness of their suicide...though I'm sure one could argue reasonably for elderly/terminal assisted suicide on your grounds (which, by the way, happens nearly every day where a relative o' mine works via morphine). Still,

Its rightfullness is independent from the suicidal man's ability to evaluate it

You got that right.

The duty to rescue appears when the injury to the resucer is negligible, but it is valorous to come to the rescue selflessly

I suppose we can't prudently expect people to be heroes, but I just can't get this quote out of my head reading your treatment of valor:

"No matter whether a man is highborn or low, if he has not put his life on the line at least once he has cause for shame." --Nabeshima Naoshige, Ideals of the Samurai

they would be wholly justified to confine their struggle to the cultural or economic sphere

Here's something I never understood about the Lockean system, I'd be grateful if you'd explain it to me: these guys didn't agree to play by any rules, so why is it "unrightful" for them to use any means necessary if they're going to die? No deal exists that would enable them to coexist and maintain their full sets of...rights...other civilizations, property rights are something that is determined in a fight.

I suggest they breed horses and start martial art studios.

If I had the loot and the land, that's what I'd be doing right now (along with FReeping and philosophizing, of course).

51 posted on 12/04/2001 8:17:13 AM PST by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Pistias
Nice in practice

Er...make that theory.

52 posted on 12/04/2001 8:18:35 AM PST by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Pistias
why is it "unrightful" for them to use any means necessary if they're going to die?

I thought we were talking of a dying culture, not a dying human being. That is when I said that the dying Arab Warrior culture, which bin Laden defends, would rightly defend itself with economic or cultural means. If they were threatened physically, then it would have been rightful for them to respond physically, provided the codicils of just war are satisfied. As it stands, the Twin Tower massacre and the bombings in Israel violated every single one of them.

54 posted on 12/04/2001 11:24:10 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson