Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who does the Bill of Rights cover?
This Week | 2 Dec 01 | Bob Barr

Posted on 12/02/2001 8:50:01 AM PST by H.Akston

Bob Barr just said on Sam and Cokie's show that the Bill of Rights is part of the Constitution, and the Constitution covers "persons", not just citizens, and "the Bill of Rights applies to all persons on our soil."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: billofrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 701-714 next last
That's about the most liberal thing I've ever heard. Doesn't he realize that the Bill of Rights and the Constitution clearly identifies who is covered by the words "WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES", and that not everyone on this soil is "OF THE UNITED STATES"?

With Rights come responsibilities - does he want to extend American rights to people who don't pay American taxes?? American Privileges without American Responsibilities, MR. BARR? Representation from you without Taxation?

I'm not even sure that Indians are covered by the Bill of Rights, unless it's specifically stated so in some bilateral treaty.

1 posted on 12/02/2001 8:50:02 AM PST by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
No, don't tell me I'm a moron - tell me why I'm wrong, if you can.
4 posted on 12/02/2001 8:53:26 AM PST by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: H.Akston
Sometimes Bob's fear of government clouds his thoughts...
5 posted on 12/02/2001 8:53:49 AM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
If the Bill or Rights applies to everyone then why do we have INS raids?
7 posted on 12/02/2001 8:55:10 AM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
You really agree that Bob Barr is wrong.
8 posted on 12/02/2001 8:55:55 AM PST by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
If you think INS raids are not a violation of the Bill or Rights then you have no problem with the INS raiding your home. Correct?
11 posted on 12/02/2001 8:57:44 AM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: go star go
If the Bill or Rights applies to everyone then why do we have INS raids?

Um ... because the INS believes people are in the country illegally? Kinda like asking "If the Bill of Rights applies to everyone then why do we have police raids?" isn't it?

12 posted on 12/02/2001 8:57:52 AM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma
If you really think I'm wrong, then you think that the Constitution starts off with "We The People of the World..."
13 posted on 12/02/2001 8:58:15 AM PST by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: H.Akston
We the people of the United States are the citizens of the United States - no one else. Our constitution covers us only. It does not cover Canadian citizens, French citizens, Mexican citizens, etc. They have their own constitutions that they base their laws on. Our constitution does not dictate laws to the whole world.
15 posted on 12/02/2001 9:00:43 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H.Akston
If you really think I'm wrong, then you think that the Constitution starts off with "We The People of the World..."

Sorry. This strikes me as a non-sequitur. Of course the people of the United States set up the country, but everyone in it has the same rights. I believe we should be flagging the FReeper lawyers on this, but the laws of the nation apply to everyone who is here, whether that person is a citizen or not.

That having been said, people acting as agents of a foreign power during time of war are and should be an exception. (If that's where this is headed).

16 posted on 12/02/2001 9:01:53 AM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
"The INS cannot raid my home without probable cause and a warrant."

That's because you (unfortunately) are one of the "People, of the United States", and not of Afghanistan, and thus are covered by the Constitution, unlike an Al-Queda network cells who have infiltrated this country, or are on an expired visa.

18 posted on 12/02/2001 9:03:41 AM PST by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: H.Akston
You seem to be suggesting that our unalienable rights are given to us by the Constitution.

Or is it that it's ok to infringe upon the rights of innocent people, as long as they're not citizens?

I'm pretty sure I don't agree with either premise.

20 posted on 12/02/2001 9:05:28 AM PST by MadameAxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 701-714 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson