Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skr
Does that mean a mother should be able to starve or asphyxiate a child that had a head injury? 36 posted by skr

No, it means that at the heart of medicine and law in America is an hypocrisy so vile that to prosecute a woman that kills her neonate is a double standard since the doctors are allowed to do it at their whim if in a hospital setting. Once the liberal puke-faced judges commit such atrocious duplicity as to condemn a woman for these vile acts you mention yet ignore 'for societal engineering purposes' the 'doctors' who do the same and worse, the judicial process is a farce. This is the demonic harvest predicted by some when Roe v Wade was decided as it was by the leftists bastards that sat that unconstitutional court in 1973, may they rot in Hell, those that wrote in support/concurrence with the sick excuse for a chief justice.

38 posted on 12/01/2001 10:01:23 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
I definitely think that the so-called doctor that would kill a child in the womb should be held accountable. Roe-vs-Wade was a horrible travesty based on untruths and an agenda by followers of Margaret Sanger's twisted world view.
88 posted on 12/04/2001 7:42:53 PM PST by skr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson