The inaccuracies of BeAChooser concern me. And I want to know who is paying him to post this stuff. I've posted a link to a very reliable souce showing detailed pictures from the Ron Brown murder autopsy and BAC denies they're authentic. For some reason he won't accept that Ron Brown was murdered and these pictures prove it. Why? Well if the Ron Brown case is solved BAC won't have anything to post about. Its disgusting.
Go ahead. Repost your source URL ... if you can even find it again. I dare you! I'll BET you that it is NOT the original source of the images. I'll BET you that the original source (Janoski and Cogswell via Ruddy) has stated that NO AUTOPSY was done.
In fact, just so people understand what a LIAR you are, yesterday I pinged you about an interview (http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a2b498c045c.htm) done by Janoski ... the person who took the pictures you are talking about. You responded so I know you visited the thread. In that INTERVIEW with Janoski, she explicitly states that NO AUTOPSY was done. You are a LIAR and the ONLY reason I can imagine for you lying about this matter is that you are also a democRAT, who doesn't want the Brown case investigated.
And as to your statement that I denied the authenticity of the images, you are a LIAR (but what is new?). On the thread where you first posted the image of the hole in Brown's head and your BOGUS definition of "autopsy" (to another individual who then challenged the authenticity), "I" was the one who stepped in and told that individual that the image was authentic and I noted the ORIGINAL source.
You are a LIAR, VA Advogado, and ANYONE who takes at face value ANYTHING you write from now on is fool of the first order. You've been caught and you are STILL lying. NOTHING is going to get you out of this now except changing your screen name and PRETENDING to be someone else.