Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine; elfman2
You have nothing to be proud of on this thread

God alone is judge...I only lost my temper at the end. The atheists resorted to ad hominem towards the author quite early.

As far as needing help, all of us do, but some are too proud to admit it.

Emotionally unstable? If righteous indignation is such than emotionally unstable is a badge I will wear with pride.

Moralizing? If that is your only answer to elfman's violation of another's trust, then you too fulfill your role quite well as a typical atheist.

--Still proud2bRC

229 posted on 12/06/2001 9:48:55 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: proud2bRC
Ah, you see? You assume I am an atheist.

Wrong again. And pitiful.

230 posted on 12/06/2001 10:30:43 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

To: proud2bRC
"The atheists resorted to ad hominem towards the author quite early.
If that is your only answer to elfman's violation of another's trust, then you too fulfill your role quite well as a typical atheist.
--Still proud2bRC_"

Emotionally unstable was generous. You're simply lying to defend a lie.

Morella slandered and lied in the first sentence. (Proven in #146) So people attacked him.

If a reporter warns a politician that everything he says may be on the record because they think it should be public, and the politician's next sentence is, "I want this off the record: 'bla bla bla…'", there's nothing wrong with reporting it.

But Morella leaves that part out when claiming that he has been wronged and I'm therefore "inherently dishonest". Just like Bill Clinton, saying there "IS" no sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinski, it's intended to leave a false impression. Therefore, it's a lie. Bill Clinton lied. Morrella is lying.

Because I warned him that I may print it, I did not "violate another's trust" as YOU claim. Your remark is like when Bill Clinton said to the nation, "Although my earlier statements were technically accurate, they were less than forthcoming". Bull. Critical details were deleted to give the wrong meaning. So he lied. You leave out that important warning I gave Morella. So you are now lying.

I don't have to pull you out of your denial and get you to say "uncle" on this. It's on the record, and everyone can see it. Now as you and Morrella plan your publicity tour, attacking atheist with lies, you'll be dependent on keeping the truth suppressed with more lies. You won't direct anyone to this thread, you'll just lie about it, hoping it doesn't come to light or if so, not too often.

Curious, that puts you on,… the dark side. That's not the role of a Christian.

I have a great deal of respect for all Christians who live their lives with piety. I don’t see anything (other than maybe misplaced loyalty) worth respecting you for here. Only Fear (afraid to defend #146 on your own), bitterness, and now lying. I don't see any Christianity in your behavior here at all. Just some short sightedly self-serving anger that gets you the privilege of mopping up after a fanatical egomaniac who's too much of a slippery fast talking coward to defend his own lies publicly in a reasoned way.

Morella claimed to be willing to debate, but not here because he doesn't want to have to deal with "my cheerleaders" But this forum's probably 90% populated by conservative Christians. Notice how few have come to either your or Morella's defense.

Christian's are overwhelmingly good people. They know trash when they see it. Your behavior no more represents Christians than that of Osama represents Muslims.

233 posted on 12/07/2001 7:36:04 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson