Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jackbill
Better yet, gasoline....

Why bother with gas, use NAPALM!!!

28 posted on 11/30/2001 6:57:14 PM PST by doomtrooper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: doomtrooper99
I'm dead serious, we need to make this the most dramatic and explosive event possible. Mount St Helens is my model. The "Arab street" will be in awe, and it would be poetic justice for the dramatic Twin Towers takedown.
32 posted on 11/30/2001 7:09:15 PM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: doomtrooper99
Why bother with gas, use NAPALM!!!

I believe we got rid of that. Too inhumane you understand. However, FAE's are OK? Well I guess I just don't understand the nuances of a fiery death. Besides in this case you want the stuff to flow, not to stick, which is what Nape tends to do. Natural gas also flows to the low spots. We had a nasty section explosion and fire in Texas a few years back. A NG pipeline broke and the stuff filled all the low places, until some dufuss drove a car through one of them, then BOOM! a good chuck of countryside went up. Fortunately it was not a contained explosion, but probably was somewhat similar to an FAE on a larger scale.

53 posted on 11/30/2001 9:26:48 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson