Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Who should be Time magazine's "Man of the Year" ?

The count of votes for Osama bin Laden is: 23.25%

The count of votes for George W. Bush is: 26.34%

The count of votes for Tony Blair is: 3.60%

The count of votes for Donald Rumsfeld is: 2.57%

The count of votes for Passengers of United Airlines Flight #93 is: 43.62%

The count of votes for Barbara Olson is: 0.62%


Seems like Barbara Olsen should be at least up there with Tony Blair.

1 posted on 11/29/2001 11:40:26 AM PST by henbane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: henbane
Did Time provide a starter list of nominees? Hard to believe Giuliani didn't get some votes.
48 posted on 11/29/2001 1:39:39 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Hitler being man of the year served its purpose. Please read the excerpt from Time in 1938: Hitler: Man Of Year 1938

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and I think that it is much better to highlight the activities and effects of these maniacs than to sweep them under the rug like the Clintons and their complicit media cronies did. Hitler was affecting the world in 1938 and Time tried to get fat, lazy Americans to see this, to no avail.

In my opinion, Osama bin Laden should be Man of the Year 2001. And hopefully it will be a posthumous award in dishonor of his notoriety.

49 posted on 11/29/2001 2:06:29 PM PST by tgiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson