[Lucius Cornelius Sulla]

. Bush has already proven (to me, anyways) that his intentions are not benign, and are fast approaching the preclusion of good. It was not for nothing that the Founders so soberly considered, and so carefully, assiduously and deliberately included among our specifically enumerated rights that of keeping and bearing arms. No...we have nothing to fear...so long as we remain cognizant of the bounds of human ambition, and the frailty of the spirit which constrains it.

I wonder if you are aware that your combining a statement of Presidential iniquity, with the known reason for the second amendment, and the statement about human fraility, either means nothing, or it implies a desire to accomplish the assassination of the President of the United States. If this is not what you mean to imply, you had better say so in short order.

[Le-Roy]

or it implies a desire to accomplish the assassination of the President of the United States.

   Well, that's a hell of a leap of illogic. What I stated was no more or less than a distillation of the thought processes employed by those who formulated, debated, wrote the Constitution of the U.S., and voted in the affirmative to adopt into the aforementioned the absolute and unequivocal right for the citizenry to be able to defend any usurpation of its rights by its servant, the gummint.

   Rather interesting that you would find it 'threatening'.