Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TKEman
I read your reply. Here's what I don't understand about your mindset (I'm serious; I just don't get it): Are you somehow intimating that Jim, John, or whoever else is getting rich off of this site? Are you suggesting that they're taking donated funds and partying it away? What EXACTLY are you suggesting? FR isn't a 501(c)3; it's an LLC, and on the FR home page under the heading "Who Runs Free Republic?", Jim addresses this issue in a straightforward manner. Either way, that means it isn't a public company........nor is it required to post its finances.

Look, there isn't a soul here who doesn't believe in accountability. We understand the concept; many of us are businessmen and businesswomen of many, many years. Now, I'd be the first to agree with your point if I saw non-stop fundraising threads.....raising many tens of thousands of dollars at a pop.........and JimRob was suddenly being tooled around town in a $70K custom van and JohnRob was dashing about in the latest Mercedes convertible, racing to his massage, followed by a golf game at the toniest golf course in the region. For that matter, even if after the fundraisers, we saw little to no improvement of FR's performance as a site, no improvements in John's code, etc.; IOW, no evidence that the funds were being used to keep the site up, running, and humming along smoothly, then I'd say you may have a valid point. However, even then, the only alternative would be to..............quit donating. It would be that simple.

But that just isn't the case, my friend.

We can delve into the Inaugural Ball, if you wish. I know for a fact that it lost a fortune due to various reasons, including undercharging of attendees. Sure as hell no one got rich off of that one.

So.........tell me. This isn't about posting a chart of accounts or a balance sheet. I just don't believe that. What exactly is it about? Are you suggesting that if Jim decided to post his finances on this board for all to see that the "AF'ers" would be silenced? Sorry, my friend; that may be a well-meaning thought, but it's also hopelessly naive. The "AF'ers" tend to share a few things in common: they tend to be generally on the acerbic side (I'm being generous there), they all seem to feel that they.........individually, not the collective "they"..........should somehow, some way, for some reason be "leaders of the movement" and are frustrated as all hell that they aren't...and lastly, they're consumed with bitterness for being banned for one reason or another.

I've studied 'em enough to know that the above is a true and accurate assessment. They are not a group who, with hand over heart, decided to expose the "Great JimRob FR Fundraising Scam for the Good of the Country, by God!!!" Nothing of the sort.

I'll shut up now and await your response.

870 posted on 11/29/2001 3:27:04 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies ]


To: RightOnline
Dang, son! You need a pulpit! I can direct you to a few empty ones, should you ever tire of your present endeavors. :)
888 posted on 11/29/2001 3:41:07 AM PST by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies ]

To: RightOnline
I would encourage you to go over to:

www.delphi.com\frureform

Go to the start tab, and click on the links to the other web sites. The answers to your questions will be found there. Look over the Talkspot information.

1,370 posted on 11/29/2001 9:06:29 AM PST by TKEman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson