Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Z2
Yep. That would be it. I don't think anyone would argue the video was a commercial venture. No mass marketing, on-air ad buys or distribution was involved. Of course if music halls begin to be rented and the video shows up at screenings or concerts...that's a horse of a different color.

I doubt ASCAP or BMI will be knocking on anyone's door since the Greenwood song was a second generation element and not the purpose of the video. Now, if someone had been singing the Mickey Mouse Club song, Disney would be hacking heads.

3,334 posted on 02/19/2002 9:56:47 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3329 | View Replies ]


To: Deb
That's interesting, Deb. What would be the implications of including Monty Python material, assuming it were used without permission?
3,335 posted on 02/19/2002 10:03:39 PM PST by Z2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3334 | View Replies ]

To: Deb
Deb,

Another question comes to mind. Hypothetically, what if a copyright holder simply didn't wish to have his song associated with a particular event, and refused permission for that reason? Does he have the right to control who can use his property in that circumstance?

3,339 posted on 02/19/2002 10:16:02 PM PST by Z2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson