Replies

I'm coming into this late, but I just wanted to add my 2 cents. When you said that Arator was an anti-freeper, I was surprised... because as long as I've known Mark, he has never been one of them, even after everything he's been through. Just posting on those sites doesn't make one an anti-freeper. (If that were the case, then I guess appy-pappy, lazamataz, harrowup, Deb and other freepers are 'AF-ers')

There is a difference between banned Freepers who may disagree w/ your policies.... and hateful anti-FReepers whose goal is bring down Free Republic.

Personally, I wish all of those people who wish to "bring down" FR would just get a life and go away. Their obsession is unhealthy. (Remember...its just the internet, folks! Get a grip!)

(Remember...its just the internet, folks! Get a grip!)

And chess is just chess, but a wee bit less interesting for the average sports fan. A good board (a GOOD board) is chess as a contact sport, as you should know.

As to posting on the anti-FR spin-offs, it's not the act, but the content. Within the microcosm , judge and be judged. NO DOUBLE STANDARDS!

Again, as you should know.

"There is a difference between banned Freepers who may disagree w/ your policies.... and hateful anti-FReepers whose goal is bring down Free Republic."

Thank you for posting this. I agree totally.