I suppose. And so would all 70,000 others who "chipped in for the paint." And if Mr. A wanted a red barn and Ms. B wanted it blue, how do we reconcile THOSE differences? Do we paint the barn purple, thus enraging the anti-purples? Do we paint it white or beige -- some nice neutral that bores everyone to tears? Or do we contribute the money secure in the knowledge that the farmer is smart enough to paint the barn the color HE wants because it's HIS barn and he'll never please everyone anyway.
That seems to boil the option down to either contribute, knowing that that doesn't buy you a seat on the Board of Directors, or don't contribute and continue to use the service for free. At least until it reaches the point where either the farmer throws the deadbeats out of the barn, or the IRS forecloses on the farm and you have to hold your shindigs in the church basement.
----- How bout a third option? - Public pressure on the deadbeat.
The mechanism for such is already in place.
-- I've made over 6500 posts to FR since April 2001, according to John Robs new self search page navigation link, here:
------------------------------------------
Navigation:
use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 6,551-6,571 next last
-------------------------------------------
--------- That 'post total to date' [6571] could be on public display on the members Home page, along with a 'donation status' percent [100%], based on, say a 1 cent per post suggested minimum donation.
Thus, when my posts reach 20,000 -and my total donations remain at $100.00, my donation status would be [50%].
Peer pressure on big mouth posters [like me] with low percentages would rapidly solve the deadbeat problem, imo.