Skip to comments.
[Fight PFLAG - put $5 in the Red Kettle] 'Kettle Protest' Against Salvation Army Backfiring
CNSNews.com ^
| 11-28-01
Posted on 11/28/2001 7:08:07 PM PST by Notwithstanding
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Notwithstanding
I put a real $5 in the last kettle that I passed. I guess I'll just have to put a $20 in the next one.
To: Notwithstanding
No help from me for the Salvation army. Not anymore. I might give them a phoney five dollar bill with bush's picture on it. They supported bush and his unconstitutional faith based charity scheme.
WarHawk42
3
posted on
11/28/2001 7:17:44 PM PST
by
WarHawk42
To: *Christian_list; *Catholic_list; *Religion; patent; *fake hate crimes; *Heresy...
bump
To: WarHawk42
The Salvation Army is the absolute best charity around. I'd trust them with my last buck. They have very low overhead and don't waste donor dollars on phoney baloney PC crap.
5
posted on
11/28/2001 7:22:17 PM PST
by
reaganite
To: The Real Deal
I put a real $5 in the last kettle that I passed. I guess I'll just have to put a $20 in the next one. When I see a Salvation Army kettle, I'll do the same thing.
A PFLAG person said that the relationship of her son with his lover is just as beautiful as the relationship of her with her husband. Somehow, I just can't imagine much beauty in smearing excrement on someone or giving mutual enemas with urine as the liquid.
Joke Infomercial on AIDs
6
posted on
11/28/2001 7:25:52 PM PST
by
UbIwerks
To: reaganite
The Salvation Army is the absolute best charity around. I'd trust them with my last buck. They have very low overhead and don't waste donor dollars on phoney baloney PC crap.I agree with all of that and have supported them for years, but no more, not when they came out and supported bush on the faith based scheme. Their grab for federal (my tax dollars) eliminated them from consideration by me. Let them go to bush, not me.
WarHawk42
7
posted on
11/28/2001 7:26:21 PM PST
by
WarHawk42
To: Notwithstanding
I get even more enjoyment each time I add to the kettle since their recent turnabout.
8
posted on
11/28/2001 7:27:47 PM PST
by
Umanbean
To: Notwithstanding
I love giving to a good cause bump.
9
posted on
11/28/2001 7:29:01 PM PST
by
swheats
To: Notwithstanding
I love giving to a good cause bump.
10
posted on
11/28/2001 7:29:56 PM PST
by
swheats
To: WarHawk42
What's the "faith based scheme?" Is that the opposite of the atheistic scheme? I repeat, the Salvation Army is the very best charity around!
To: Notwithstanding
ha ha ha this is going to piss off the flamers. They hate to be tochued' (in the traditional sense).
To: Notwithstanding
Just some more holiday cheer from our petulant little friends in the Culture of Death movement. If I can't have my way, watch out! I might throw a tantrum!
To: Antoninus
Just some more holiday cheer from our petulant little friends in the Culture of Death movement. If I can't have my way, watch out! I might throw a tantrum! Of course they're going to throw a temper tantrum like a little kid. What do you expect from a developmental disorder?
Narth
14
posted on
11/28/2001 7:37:58 PM PST
by
UbIwerks
To: reaganite
What's the "faith based scheme?"If you really don't know I don't have the time to go into it tonight. It has been thoroughly discussed here on FR.
I repeat, the Salvation Army is the very best charity around!
Yes you are repeating yourself and I agreed with you the first time. The Constitution is more important to me than any charity organization. Their loss.
WarHawk42
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: Notwithstanding
Thanks for the bump. I have usually tried to give a bit to the Salvation Army. I haven't seen too many kettles this year, but will have to go find a couple.
patent
18
posted on
11/28/2001 8:04:00 PM PST
by
patent
To: WarHawk42
Well, Mr. Know-It-All, I don't consider it a "scheme," no matter how many times it has been discussed here. I'm not trying to pick a fight here. I just get my belly full of all you nattering nabobs.
To: reaganite
Well, Mr. Know-It-All, I don't consider it a "scheme," no matter how many times it has been discussed here. I'm not trying to pick a fight here. I just get my belly full of all you nattering nabobs.LOL It doesn't take you long to start name calling does it?:)
Call it anything you want it is still unconstitutional. Would you have supported clinton had he tried it? There will be other democrats in office, what would they do with that program?
Best to be careful what you ask for, you may get it.
WarHawk42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson