[lewislynn]

Your credibility is waning now.

It is unfortunate about the California thing. Enron was on the right side of the argument for that...Right side of the argument for what?...By whose standards...Enrons?

Oh yeah, everything else was dirty dealing ,all the upper managment was crooked for 4 yrs, including the low life CEO that resigned after one month was crooked, but that one deal screwing Californiains...well that was on the up and up.

BTW the "welfare whackos" (as you call us) of California happens to be about the 6th largest economy in THE WORLD...You can't tell me your crooked bosses (your words) at Enron weren't trying their underhanded tricks to get a piece of that huge pie too.

[Jalapeno]

Your credibility is waning now

Credibility for what? I am make no claim here. Only stating my opinion. And yes, they are Whackos.

[Republic of Texas]

Who was trying to get a huge peice of what pie? California wanted energy companies to sell them energy at a loss because they made stupid deals. Hell they wanted to TAKE OVER energy companies. Using THAT same logic, California should BAIL Enron out because they made some stupid deals. All's fair, right?

[okie01]

lewislynn, what percentage of California's energy consumption did Enron provide?

C'mon, you know the answer. It's been published on this very forum. The figure has been shoved under your nose. You may have chosen to ignore or to forget it, but I remember.

C'mon, lewislynn. What's the answer?