A nearby thread is about the quarantine plans in place here in the USA. The post had an hysterical tone, but made one good point. If whole neighborhoods of cities, or whole cities, are to be quarantined in the case of smallpox outbreak - and cities are where this would occur, if it were to - then the quarantined people will try to escape what they see as, and is, death for them and their children. It will be neccessary to stop them. Do we have troops willing to machine gun the crowds trying to escape?
Does anybody know why the smallpox vaccine HAS to be administered the way it is? As I recall from my childhood, it was not by syringe, but by a round disk with two bigger needles and a few smaller ones. And it leaves a scar, of course.
What's the deal with that?
You were right.
But about the above, I don't think that would be necessary.
The vaccine has severe side effects in a low percentage of cases. With smallpox eradicated, there was no point in having tens of thousands suffer major side effects, including death, especially when post-exposure vaccinations work.
Where the government screwed up was in not having enough doses on hand, and the blame for that rests squarely with the Clinton Administration, which took very little interest in the issue. Instead they focused on Ebola, which is scarier, but much more difficult to spread.
Well, that makes 2 of us, but nobody was listening... I'm really steamed about it and have been since about 1980 or so. And I'm absolutely furious with WHO and congress who in their great wisdom did nothing to protect us, till the last minute. Let's just hope there's enough supply soon, just in case.