Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Press in Time of War: How things have changed since September 11 (Fred Barnes)
The Weekly Standard ^ | December 3 issue | Fred Barnes

Posted on 11/27/2001 5:29:04 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
These two books look like they'll make some good holiday reading.
1 posted on 11/27/2001 5:29:04 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *CCRM
index for Citizens Coalition for Responsible Media
2 posted on 11/27/2001 5:29:58 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calypgin; Peacerose; ForGod'sSake; Landru; bert; be-baw
I first heard about these book reviews in the MRC cyberalert. I can't wait to read Bernard Goldberg's book and the other one looks good too.
3 posted on 11/27/2001 5:32:18 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank

Rather: "I dont have liberal bias. I just like Communists and terrorists.
Especially those that made West Nile Fever in birds. (sigh)
"

4 posted on 11/27/2001 5:33:55 PM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
Good find, I'm going to check out those two books.
5 posted on 11/27/2001 5:37:04 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
Geraldo is a snake. "I'm a changed man," my ass. He still thinks NAMBLA has a constitutional right to purvey their garbage.
6 posted on 11/27/2001 5:37:12 PM PST by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
Check out the press worship mania post here, by a Mr. Assaf.
7 posted on 11/27/2001 5:37:30 PM PST by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WriteOn
I'm with you on Geraldo. How are we supposed to trust the guy just because he got a little patriotism jolt from 9/11 and is going through a mid-life crisis with regard to his machismo?
8 posted on 11/27/2001 5:40:44 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank; Howlin
Bump
9 posted on 11/27/2001 5:43:06 PM PST by Donald Stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
In fact, Baker has kind words for most of CBS's war coverage and NBC's too. "There's not much to complain about thematically from a conservative point of view," Baker says. "Certainly the tone of coverage has changed. They're eliminating the spin. They're not trying to impute political motives to everything Bush does or says."

I hear rumblings tha the media is going to get off the ship when it comes to the issue of habeus corpus...

10 posted on 11/27/2001 5:48:39 PM PST by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
Good catch. Fred should have stayed out of TV. He's a much better writer than a talking head. I never knew he had that much in him. This is a very serrious and well put analysis of the phenomenon in question. I'm still thinking about it. I may even order the books. Thanks Fred and you too SY.
11 posted on 11/27/2001 5:50:19 PM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Almost every day I check out Jim Romenesko's site to see what is happening in the world of journalism. Most of them seem to be airing their great frustration that they are becoming about as popular as turd in a swimming pool. Lots and lots of news of layoffs there.
12 posted on 11/27/2001 5:54:07 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mercy
For a generation now, the type of reporting practiced first in Washington and then nationwide has been adversarial, cynical, and highly negative.

It will take a generation to recover their collective credibility.

13 posted on 11/27/2001 5:55:11 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
Here's an interesting archive. Return to Sender U.S. Censorship of Enemy Alien Mail in World War II

<Snip>

Censorship predates America's independence. The First Amendment, guaranteeing freedom of the press, arose in part from censorship imposed by the British. Subsequent interpretations by the courts resulted in the protection of most forms of communication, including the mail; nevertheless, threats to the first amendment have periodically occurred throughout the nation's history. In the antebellum South, for example, a number of postmasters contributed to press censorship by refusing to deliver antislavery material, preferring the risk of federal penalties over mob attack. During the Civil War, Secretary of State William Seward refused to permit journals criticizing the administration into the mail stream, and some states banned mail delivery of newspapers such as the New York World, the Chicago Times, and the Cincinnati Enquirer.

The first systematic program to censor the mail in the twentieth century was developed by the British during the Boer War in South Africa (1899–1902). The lessons learned in that war led to widespread censorship of international mail during World War I. By the time the U.S. Army Expeditionary Forces finally arrived on the European continent in 1918, the British had evolved a highly effective system of mail censorship, as well as cable and telephone censorship, which they passed on to their American allies.

Two decades later, after declaring a national state of emergency when Hitler's forces rolled into Poland on September 1, 1939, Roosevelt was presented with several proposals of civilian and military plans for wartime censorship based uupon thework of the architects of censorship in the previous world war. On June 4, 1941, he approved a plan for national censorship of international communications and ordered the U.S. Army to develop a modern program for censoring the mails entering and leaving the United States. He also charged both the FBI and the Office of the Postmaster General with concurrent planning and directed the U.S. Navy to begin formulating a plan for censoring cable, radiotelegraph, and radiotelephone circuits.

Wartime censorship creates a multiple advantage for nations that engage in it. One objective seeks to deprive the enemy of information, as well as tangibles such as funds and commodities. A second aims to collect myriad intelligence that can be turned against the enemy.(17) Censorship also engages the populace; every letter is an exercise in good citizenship, and acquiescence to its regulations represents a contribution to the war effort. In World War II, postal, cable, broadcast, and press censorship affected the lives of civilians and military personnel in virtually every country of the world, both belligerent and neutral. World War II produced the world's largest censorship operation—one that has not yet been matched.

On December 8, 1941, the secretary of war ordered corps area commanders to inaugurate censorship of telephone and telegraph wires crossing international borders. Three days later, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, on presidential authority, helped set up a postal censorship program to be carried out by the War Department. He was ordered to hold this temporary position until his civilian replacement could be chosen.

<Snip>

14 posted on 11/27/2001 5:59:17 PM PST by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
...and they have NO CLUE as to their intellectual isolation.

If they weren't still acting as info gatekeepers for much of the country, it would actually be funny.

15 posted on 11/27/2001 5:59:17 PM PST by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
Thanks for that very interesting read. Like all liberals, the press loves to consider that the worst crime of all is censorship. But they practice it themselves in so many ways through PCism. Larry Elder wrote a book called "Ten Things You cannot Say in America."
16 posted on 11/27/2001 6:04:26 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
Look at all the censorship the media did of Clinton. That itself was a crime. The press never told the truth about his crimes, instead, they blamed it on Rush or the VRWC...

The link is really interesting, but long. I just posted a little snippet. I also read somewhere during WWII people were receiving letters with entire words cut out of letters. No one complained.

17 posted on 11/27/2001 6:10:03 PM PST by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
Oh, what are the "Ten Things You cannot Say in America?"
18 posted on 11/27/2001 6:10:49 PM PST by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
I haven't read the book myself so I don't know, but Larry Elder is a black conservative so I'm sure there are some things that he has firsthand knowledge of regarding race. You know, the media establishment pretends that black conservatives do not exist.
19 posted on 11/27/2001 6:15:14 PM PST by Mr. Mulliner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Singapore_Yank
I like JC Watts (excellent conservative, I wish we had him in Wisconsin) and Walter Williams (great sub for Rush).
20 posted on 11/27/2001 6:22:02 PM PST by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson