You are making little if any sense. You are rambling. The crap that the NTSB gave us did not match either the radar or the FDR and was of little value because of this. You are now stating that if it were good enough for the NTSB, it is good enough for you. The NTSB gave us garbage just as you are giving us garbage. You now claim that your coordinates are complete when they are not. I have been telling you that the numbers themselves are meaningless and I get the impression that you may now agree since a three dimensional world cannot be explained in two dimensional terms. The view shown as either plan or elevation tells the tale, not the numbers themselves. We can see for a fact that two objects were seen in each twelve second period of sweep. The numbers in the charts don't do a damn thing beyond that other than tell us that there was a nominal half mile vertical differenctial between the two objects and the scale in the plan view shows a mile plus or minus differential though the actual cable length is much more than that being similar to a catenary. It is nice that you now admit that two radar returns are shown. Congratulations. Apparently your weasel wording has run out.
Sorry, I just can't stop myself. Read your quote here:
"You are making little if any sense. You are rambling."
And then read your quote here (which appears just a few lines after your first quote):
"The numbers in the charts don't do a damn thing beyond that other than tell us that there was a nominal half mile vertical differenctial between the two objects and the scale in the plan view shows a mile plus or minus differential though the actual cable length is much more than that being similar to a catenary."
Whaaat?