What is you evidence there was any chaff involved in any way in the Flight 800 disaster?You initially also alleged that your sled towing P-3 U.S. Navy accidental shootdown allegations are supported by a witness but fell on your face because you couldn't even provide the name of any such witness, much less a supporting witness report.
The "shootdown" tinfoil hatters have been inciting suspicion, fear and hatred of the U. S. government and thousands of other Americans including members of the armed forces for nearly 5 1/2 years but have never been able to present the public with one atom of physical evidence of a "shootdown" during all that time. Neither have they ever been able to find even ONE expert witness report analyst who agrees with their "missile witnesses" allegations - the cornerstone of their "case".
Since 11 September 2001 this country has been at war with enemies who have already killed thousands of Americans and who are also intent on inciting suspicion, fear and hatred of the United States government and our military forces now in harms way. It's readily apparent from the 9/11 events, the Anthrax letter mailings and the reported biological and perhaps even nuclear capabilites of those enemies that ALL Americans are in grave peril.
By what logic are you and the other "shootdown" tinfoil hatters not giving aid and comfort to those enemies?
OK, then you must be able to tell me which sets I should compare.
"Also, three dimensional data requires x,y and z."
True, but the data (picture) on page 42 does not represent a three dimensional view. What's your point?
"You left out a major axis reference."
Kind of hard to plat data that doesn't exist. The Boston Center radar doesn't record elevation. Again, if you don't believe me, call the FAA.
" The NTSB moved a block of chaff data by rotating its reference to the receiving antenna and I don't believe any specific data as a result of this."
If you don't believe any data, then what the heck is your whole "double returns" theory based on??? Well, when all else fails, you can always create something that doesn't exist and then say the government lied about it. That is the usual strategy conspiracists take. Is this the chaff that was supposedly expelled by your hybrid missile?
Sorry, I forgot to answer this. But I think the lightbulb is starting to come on for you. The Boston Center radar data is obviously flawed. It includes data that the radar could not have seen based on a 12 second sweep rate. Therefore, your entire "double return" P-3 sled theory is based on flawed data. Since 8 radars tracked the P-3, doesn't it make sense to rely on the data of the seven radars that agree, and ignore the one data set that could not have happened.