You didn't watch the cartoon? Where did the pressure come from that 'supposedly' blew off the nose? If you were inside a cylinder of your car's engine would you only suffer singed hair? The nose came off due to inertia from the violent CCW yaw. It peeled to the right and above. The break line showed tension failure in the bottom and left hand side and compression failure in the top and right hand side. There is a bent piece of skin sticking out of the reconstruction which mirrors this fold. The nose wreckage was found off to the right hand side of the line toward the main wreckage point in the seabed. The charring on the outer fuselage was absent forward of the breakline but heavy aft of the break line. The nose was already gone when the CWT event (flame up or explosion) occurred. How did seats become charred while no victims were charred? The victims, also, were gone when the CWT event occurred. The yaw tore off both the nose and empennage. Many of the 'Bobs' came from the center sectiion relative to seating assignments. The 'seat belt light' had not yet been turned off. The cabin crew was free to move about. You write as though you may have taken part in the cover-up. Did you.
"Where did the pressure come from that 'supposedly' blew off the nose?"
You have the NTSB report. Read about the break-up sequence. It is very detailed and very clear, and Boeing concurs with it.
"How did seats become charred while no victims were charred?"
Here's a test. Flash a blowtorch on a thin piece of fabric or foam rubber. Now flash it on your skin. Which one burns better/faster?
"You write as though you may have taken part in the cover-up. Did you."
You write as though you live in a fantasy land. I think you do.