Why don't you get ahold of Mr .Fibber McGee KALLSTROM and ask him to explain the 30-Knot boat, heading away fron crash site from almost directly below it, that he (Kallstrom) "morphed" into a Helicopter. What was up with that big lie?! Huh Huh Huh?
Then he had to quit that lie when he realised that a rougue helicopter, flying helter skelter around N.Y. and" nobody" know who it is, or where there from, or where they went is totally unbelievable, and would be darn right scary if it were true!
So how about it--was it a 30-Knot boat, or was it, as Kallstrom said on national t.v., a helicopter?!
More mythology from the "fifth grade was a bear -- both years" crowd. There are literally thousands of boats and hundreds of aircraft in the New York area at any time.
Let's see, when a missile is fired at an aircraft there is a very bright exhaust and a LARGE plume of smoke that lingers. Some witnesses saw a momentary "streak of light." Hmmm... sounds more like a Buck Rogers Death Ray. NO witness saw the lingering smoke plume. Hey, Mr. "huh huh huh," how come there was no shrapnel damage on the airframe? How come the explosion came from inside the plane and not out? (believe it or not, people who study this stuff can tell which side the blast was on... because the metal bends away from it. Imagine that!).
How come there are several other cases of these explosions?
How come the only theory for which there's physical evidence is an internal fuel explosion?
How come spectrographic analysis shows no explosives residue? Do you know what spectrographic analysis is and why they used it?
Then he had to quit that lie when he realised that
And your proof that it is a lie is... the fact that you don't agree with it? Okay, I'll take your word over the army of criminal and aviation investigators who spent a year of more of their lives on this case.
a rougue helicopter,
You probably mean rogue (uncontrolled, indisciplined). Of course you could mean rouge in which case we know whose helicopter it is, RuPaul's. But what you wrote is not a common English word.
flying helter skelter around N.Y.
Actually, whoever was flying it probably had a reason.
and" nobody" know who it is, or where there from, or where they went is totally unbelievable, and would be darn right scary if it were true!
Well, get scared, because (prior to 9/11, and again when the National Airspace System returns to normalcy) you can actually take your helicopter and fly it in lots of places, even right in New York City (there is a VFR corridor around Manhattan in normal times). You not only don't need to talk to any controller, they would actually just as soon you didn't and just followed the rules (they're busy guys and gals in there!). You can also take a boat and go for a cruise or a sail without telling a single soul. You can get into your car and drive to Chicago and Mayor Daley won't have the slightest idea you are coming. It is a concept called freedom of movement, present in all free societies and absent in all police states.
Perhaps you preferred the Soviet system where one's comings and goings are logged by professional snoops in every block.
I won't bother to correct the grammar in the sentence I quoted. It was a mess, but perfectly comprehensible. But you should check things carefully, because no one will take your writing seriously unless you bring it up to middle school level.
So how about it--was it a 30-Knot boat, or was it, as Kallstrom said on national t.v., a helicopter?!
So what earthly difference does it make when the aircraft was absolutely, positively not hit by a missile? And where there is utterly no sign of a missile having been fired, except for some eyewitnesses seeing a "streak of light" which is not what a surface-to-air missile resembles?
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F