To: Sal
#122 Agree. While I do not have complete trust in him, I can't see Danforth deliberately hiding what happened. Read once or twice, I believe in Dallas Morning News about his statement that information was not provided. Maybe a CYA on his part, but I hope not.
128 posted on
11/28/2001 5:38:46 PM PST by
katze
To: katze
I can't quite believe Danforth didn't know he was reporting lies. I know some managers delegate a lot more than others. Reagan was a BIG delegator and I liked and admired him. I guess its's possible Danforth trusted people he shouldn't have, but don't ya think he just might have noticed when TWO of his major technical witnesses were taken out... Especially when they were the ones who said 180 degrees different from what his final report said. If I remember correctly one of them (not an old man) died of what apppeared to be a "heart attack" in his lab, and the other had a serious "stroke" from which he recovered to some degree, but he didn't testify after that.
Here's a link for the DMN archive URL you sent me. Thanks.
134 posted on
11/28/2001 7:09:57 PM PST by
Sal
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson