Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
Thanks, but for some reason, these editorials were not available on the Boston Globe web site.

At least, I couldn't find them.

5 posted on 11/25/2001 7:07:10 AM PST by Jesse Segovia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Jesse Segovia
Oh!!! In that case, thanks for the reat effort! I will be back.
6 posted on 11/25/2001 7:11:36 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jesse Segovia
The best reading of the second amendment, I believe, would recognize that it was designed to oblige the national government to maintain and support the state-based militia as part of the overall defense establishment. It would therebyprevent the national government from relying solely on the dreaded “standing army,” which many Americans believed would be inimical to liberty.

This is a silly argument. Article I section 8 already does this. The Second Amendment is an amendment, so it supersedes the rest of the Constitution. If the Senate had left in the phrase "the whole of the people" the anti-rights crowd would now be claiming that that proved that they did *not* mean "individual" rights.

7 posted on 11/25/2001 7:24:50 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson