Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco Airport Workers Upset They May Lose Jobs Over Citizenship
AP Breaking news ^ | 11/24/2001 | Karen Gaudette Associated Press Writer

Posted on 11/24/2001 9:24:45 PM PST by KQQL

San Francisco Airport Workers Upset They May Lose Jobs Over Citizenship

By Karen Gaudette Associated Press Writer
Published: Nov 24, 2001

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Security screeners at San Francisco International Airport are upset that they could lose their jobs under a new federal law requiring them to gain U.S. citizenship, and the city's mayor has offered to intervene. Some workers have threatened a sickout Sunday that could create kinks as travelers return from the biggest travel weekend of the year. But airport and union officials said the majority of workers were expected to report to work.

"We understand from the union that they're confident there won't be any type of action," airport duty manager Bob Rotiski said Saturday. "The union has a good feel for what the employees are going to do, and they've assured us that they're not going to walk out."

SFO spokesman Ron Wilson said workers' supervisors would fill in for employees who do not come to work.

The new federal law requires all security screeners to become U.S. citizens within a year. Leaders of Service Employees International Union Local 790 say as many as 80 percent of the 1,200 screeners at SFO are legal residents, not citizens. Those not already on the cusp of attaining citizenship could lose their jobs, said Daz Lampares, SFO representative for the union.

Union leaders say they hope workers stay on the job Sunday and let SFO director John Martin and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown negotiate with Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta on a plan that would allow the busiest airports to employ some non-citizens.

The mayor "has definitely indicated he would try to talk with federal officials," said Brown's spokesman, P.J. Johnston. "This is not a typical labor issue where the workers have a beef with management. This is a situation that's been handed down from the federal government."

Johnston said no meeting has been scheduled and he is unsure what type of plan Brown would submit.

Wilson said airport officials empathize with the workers, but worry a walkout would shut down the airport and hurt chances of a compromise.

AP-ES-11-24-01 2054EST


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: KQQL
If these FOREIGN SLIMEBALLS walk out, maybe we should give the jobs to REAL AMERICANS. But oh no!, that wouldn't be good for "diversity" !!
21 posted on 11/24/2001 10:12:21 PM PST by lafayette76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Wanna bet they are going to try to get a special bill passed in Congress making them U.S. citizens?
22 posted on 11/24/2001 10:27:28 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Security screeners at San Francisco International Airport are upset that they could lose their jobs under a new federal law requiring them to gain U.S. citizenship

I'm sure that I am not the only one who stopped reading after this.

23 posted on 11/24/2001 10:29:10 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
as many as 80 percent of the 1,200 screeners at SFO are legal residents, not citizens.

AM I READING THIS RIGHT??

Up to nine-hundred-and-sixty (960) SFO screeners are still FOREIGN CITIZENS!? Wow.

24 posted on 11/24/2001 10:32:43 PM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: KQQL
FIRE EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM!
26 posted on 11/24/2001 10:35:06 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing
First of all Idiot not all screeners are idiots.. I am an airport screener supervisor and I am not an idiot. Only and immature idiot would generalize and call all screeners idiots. Secondly the mess we are in was not created by airport screeners it was created by x42 and his minions. I spent 22 years in the US Army. Most of which was in the Finance Corps. Once again all airport screeners are not idiots...
27 posted on 11/24/2001 10:49:18 PM PST by silverkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
the screeners didn't get us in this mess... there was no law against bringing a box-cutter on the plane.. or a knife. The INS messed up, they are already federalized.That is so lame, you do place the blame squarly on the INS, which is right. But it has nothing to do with them being a federal agency.
28 posted on 11/24/2001 10:50:22 PM PST by snodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lafayette76; KQQL; newsperson999; patriciaruth
If these FOREIGN SLIMEBALLS walk out, maybe we should give the jobs to REAL AMERICANS. But oh no!, that wouldn't be good for "diversity" !!

The "real Americans;" whose "jobs Americans won't do" were stolen from them by criminal aliens; had "jobs" created for them by the in-the-hands-of-the-vast-criminal-enterprises-usually-referred-to-as-the-"Democratic"-party feral gummint.

At the INS.

The staff at the INS; that is; are the very folks who used to pick lettuce, flip burgers, wipe off wet cars in service stations and load bags into airplanes before we dumbed down the specs for all those kinds of jobs.

[And inched America closer to becoming part of the turd wurld]

29 posted on 11/24/2001 10:58:32 PM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Tough nuggies.
Flipping chanels tonight and listened to some senator promise us tonight that these people won't be you're usual dirt bags entrenched in the public trough. They will be able to get fired!!!!!! Yeah right. Wish him well but still don't believe him.
Worked in the V.A. hospital system for 7 year. No better swill. Watchin a nurse leave a food tray to a man that has no use of his arms and say see you later does something to you.
30 posted on 11/24/2001 11:00:21 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newsperson999
This kind of crap just pi$$es me off! What is wrong in this country that 80% of the security screeners are not citizens? Why on earth are there so many people living here for year after year who have no intention of becoming citizens?
31 posted on 11/24/2001 11:03:07 PM PST by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
So, about 800 new jobs as security screeners at $35,000 a year will be available soon at SFO to the recently laid off airline workers?

Just a thought in passing, does their becoming federal workers mean that President Bush can fire them all if they strike like Reagan fired all the PATCO air traffic controllers that struck back in the early 80's?

32 posted on 11/24/2001 11:05:03 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Leaders of Service Employees International Union Local 790 say as many as 80 percent of the 1,200 screeners at SFO are legal residents, not citizens.

The other day I tried to get temporary work at a place called 'Labor Ready.' I was informed they had more jobs than people, and if I showed up early, I would get a job.

I showed up at five thirty (AM), and waited until nine thirty. I never got a job.

Meanwhile, I suspect certain 'non-citizens' (you know who they are!) were getting priority over me.

These were jobs to work in the cold wet mud. Not high paying at all!

Yet we're told over and over again that the immigrants are here because Americans won't work at these jobs. Funny, I saw a lot of Americans waiting in that room with me!

Now we have a situation where non-citizens get priority hiring and even have a union under their control. In a job where the safety and security of American lives are at stake.

We have truly entered the Twilight Zone. I suspect the government's response to this airport security problem will be to quietly issue a waiver allowing the non-citizens to work for the federal government -- or just pretend the problem isn't there.

Meantime, people as white as Winston Churchill will be shaken down and forced to 'dance' under the scanning wands each time they travel by plane. That didn't stop 587 from blowing up, did it?

33 posted on 11/24/2001 11:14:20 PM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
these are future rat voters.
34 posted on 11/24/2001 11:17:02 PM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Oh, I think they already vote that way.
35 posted on 11/24/2001 11:25:24 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
What is your job situation as to skills, education? Where do you live and why do you live there?
36 posted on 11/24/2001 11:28:20 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Ditto your comments.

Moreover, not only should they lose their jobs, if they're here illegally, they should be deported post haste.

37 posted on 11/24/2001 11:43:39 PM PST by Dixielander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: silverkor
International Union Local 790 say as many as 80 percent of the 1,200 screeners at SFO are legal residents, not citizens.

I am an airport screener supervisor and I am not an idiot.

Am I the only one who sees a problem with 80% of airport security screners being other than US citizens? This fact alone is reason enough not to fly or even set foot in an airport.
Does anyone think they could find another country where foreigners run 80% of anything?

38 posted on 11/24/2001 11:50:31 PM PST by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
I agree with you about the high percentage of screeners who are not American citizens however, that does not make them idiots. I work at the Anchorage Airport where we have about a 40 percent non citizen work force and for the most part they are filipinos at least that is the case here in Anchorage. The contractor here is Huntleigh-USA which is an Israeli owned company whose parent company is ITS which is headquartered in I believe the Netherlands. I believe whole heartedly that all screeners should be US citizens. But I do not think that we should be federalized that will solve absolutely nothing IMHO. I know first hand what is happening on a daily basis at the Anchorage Internation Airport which is occupied by for the most part Alaska Airlines. Which is our employer.
39 posted on 11/25/2001 12:04:01 AM PST by silverkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Security screeners at San Francisco International Airport are upset that they could lose their jobs under a new federal law requiring them to gain U.S. citizenship, and the city's mayor has offered to intervene.

Sorry, but the safety and security of the public, if not the security of the entire country comes first. Its necessary, and the Mayors office shouldnt be intervening.

40 posted on 11/25/2001 12:12:47 AM PST by cascademountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson