Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ms. AntiFeminazi
Your pretty good to have been able to read the Whole Law over the HOLIDAY weekend.Im still reading it.Just trying to get around all the "Related" stuff.The problem you seem to be facing is two fold.First,What Constitutes "Terrorism".And second you are putting alot of faith in Government officials to decide what is and is not.Our last ???????I cant say it,said it best(paraphrase)What the meaning of IS....IS.I am a member of a sub culture and have seen first hand through "RICO" UNCONSTITUTIONAL Laws at work.I especially look at them when passed in hast because they useually get twisted around and 99% used for something else.....Mam.
79 posted on 11/27/2001 8:10:34 PM PST by DAGO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: DAGO
I would also like to add,there seems to be an awfull lot of EO's these days.Seems like the wave of the future.Have you compared the amount of Shrubs to previous prezes?
80 posted on 11/27/2001 8:13:59 PM PST by DAGO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: DAGO
I especially look at them when passed in hast because they useually get twisted around and 99% used for something else.

And people like you come on here and twist their true definitions around to suit your purpose. If you want to convince me this Act is unconstitutional, show me the proof. Let's talk specifics involving real life situations, not just a bunch of hysterical generalizations that may or may not come to pass. If your fears become reality, it will not be because of this bill. It will be because people like you are more concerned with protecting the non-citizens of this country from a loss of freedom that was never guaranteed to them in the first place. You do it at MY expense.

81 posted on 11/27/2001 8:19:24 PM PST by Ms. AntiFeminazi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: DAGO
Im still reading it.Just trying to get around all the "Related" stuff.

Isn't that the worst?! If I could write laws, the first one I would write would be that each new bill is completely contained within itself. If an adjustment has to be made to prior bills text or if any reference is made to a prior bill, that entire bill must be stated within the text of the new bill and the old bill removed from the records, not a "in paragraph (18), by striking the period and inserting ';and'; sheesh!!!

86 posted on 11/27/2001 8:53:25 PM PST by Ms. AntiFeminazi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson