On the other hand, if they stand by their "principles" and agree to do nothing while innocent children are slain, then they show themselves for the gutless, stupid people they are. Ask them how it would be "moral" to not defend a child!?!?
How would they intend to stop a holocaust?
Yes, how long would they stand by their "peace" ethics. Would they stand by while terrorists on our soil dragged children out of schools and executed them as infidels? If that is okay by their ethics, would they still stand by in "peace" while terrorists invaded their homes and killed their own children? The Taliban have been perfectly willing to use children as shields in Afghanistan, why would anyone think the children in this country would be any more sacred to them, were they to gain that much power.
Where do the peaceniks draw their line in the sand, or is there none? Is wholesale slaughter of their own family okay by their ethics? It is apparently okay if it happens to people in New York, 3,000 miles away from Seattle. I guess no matter what happens to Americans, it's okay with the peaceniks, just troubling finding the right song.