Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: swheats
I wasn't arguing, I just wondered where you stood on that. I was NOT talking about a spontanious miscarriage. Some women have babies, that die in the womb and will NOT come out. If the dead baby is not removed surgically, they will often die. This is something other than a still birth.

I also know ( first hand, since it happened to a dear friend ) that tubal pregnancies are horrible things. The women, who are forced to have the baby removed because of this, are ones who have wanted to have that child, with ALL of their hearts. It is one of the saddest things.

I can not condem these poor women. If they didn't have the surgery, they would die. Just in case someone reading this doesn't know abou tubal pregnancies ( which are rare, bt NOT as rare as one might think ) the baby doesn't attach to the inside of the womb. Instead , it somehow gets out, attached to a Fallopian tube, and as the baby grow, it can explode the tube ... killing the woman and dying itself.

73 posted on 11/24/2001 10:39:35 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons
We agree on the issues that you mentioned. I would not want any woman's life to be sacrificed for the sake of the pregnancy for medical necessity. Abortions became big business, cash only facilities making a killing (pardon the pun) making deposits of blood money.

What once used to be an answer for women whose baby had died in the womb has now become a way of life for promiscuous girls/women looking for a quick way out of responsibility. But that's just MHO.

74 posted on 11/24/2001 10:56:10 PM PST by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson