To: blam
Now that we have proven that plants are capable of suffering, does this mean that vegetarians are now going to have to starve to death?
To: SamAdams76
Now that we have proven that plants are capable of suffering, does this mean that vegetarians are now going to have to starve to death? LOL!
7 posted on
11/23/2001 8:38:03 PM PST by
Mulder
To: SamAdams76
LOL!!! -- of course, there is always fruit. do you think a vegetarian who now only eats fruit would touch a tomato?
10 posted on
11/23/2001 8:41:09 PM PST by
mlocher
To: SamAdams76
15 posted on
11/23/2001 8:50:22 PM PST by
jmp702
To: SamAdams76
Now that we have proven that plants are capable of suffering, does this mean that vegetarians are now going to have to starve to death? I've always felt that vegetarians were particularly cruel. I mean, at least animals can run, swim or fly away to avoid becoming a meal, but a plant just has to sit there and wait to be harvested.
To: SamAdams76
LOL!
To: SamAdams76
Now that we have proven that plants are capable of suffering, does this mean that vegetarians are now going to have to starve to death? Reminds me of the old joke about someone being a vegetarian not because he loved animals ... but because he hates plants.
To: SamAdams76
Uh-oh, that would mean no more beer, too. Better keep this quiet.
To: SamAdams76
Now that we have proven that plants are capable of suffering, does this mean that vegetarians are now going to have to starve to death? Yes! This leaves only dirt, sand, and rocks for them to eat!
60 posted on
11/24/2001 10:06:36 PM PST by
Jay W
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson