Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JD86
And I think you just like to argue....so you really must be a lawyer...:)

I do like to argue. With FR, I get all the arguing I need or want.

This particular rule is not my biggest concern with the Patriot Act anyhow. There are some other search provisions that do truly offend the 4th Amendment. But I do think this starts getting close to the line. Here is my thinking:

If we all agree that it is reasonable for the Government to seek information on all cash purchases in excess of $10,000. What if they want to make it $1,000, do you have a problem with that? What about ALL cash transactions? What if they say all cash transactions over $10,000 require the seller to obtain a photo of the purchasor? Where does it stop? I am 100% for fighting terrorism and criminal behavior. What I see is solution which is not going to stop terrorism, but opens the door to futher monitoring of non-criminal tranactions by citizens. Also, in addition to those with an ulterior motive in spending cash there are many people who just plain like their privacy.

274 posted on 11/24/2001 10:18:41 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]


To: TheOtherOne
I will agree that all laws have intended consequences and that some laws have unintended consequences.
277 posted on 11/24/2001 10:30:31 AM PST by JD86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson