My post was a direct counter to those of you who use twisted semantics. Remember? No equivocation?
"equivocation \E*quiv`o*ca"tion\, n. The use of expressions susceptible of a double signification, with a purpose to mislead."
I refer to any human from the time of conception until the time when discipline starts as a "baby." But arguing over a term like "baby" serves no one, which is why a straightforward, objective, scientific description of human development is to be preferred. Otherwise, we end up chasing theological and philosophical phantasms of your own imagination.