Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smallpox cure may already be in hand, U.S. scientists say
St. Pete Times ^ | 11/21/01

Posted on 11/21/2001 2:55:42 AM PST by dawn53

Smallpox cure may already be in hand, U.S. scientists say

©Associated Press November 21, 2001

Scientists in search of a smallpox cure hope they'll find one already on the shelf.

Their strategy: sift through the hundreds of potential virus medicines developed by drug companies to see if any work against smallpox. Chances are good, they say, because 21 drugs have already been identified this way that can kill the virus in a test tube.

Whether any of these will pan out in people is uncertain, but clearly the treatment of viral illnesses has undergone a revolution since smallpox was eliminated more than two decades ago. At that time, no medicine could touch a virus. Now there are drugs for flu, herpes, AIDS and other viral illnesses.

Army scientists who lead the effort say they believe using drugs already on hand rather than creating medicines from scratch will identify treatments to attack this awesome killer.

Until recently, scientists paid little attention to smallpox. But fear of it falling into the hands of bioterrorists has changed that, and the government is using modern research tools to take a detailed look at the virus.

Besides searching for medicines, they are decoding smallpox's genes, creating quick tests for infection and finding new ways to check their theories in lab animals.

Most of this is overseen by the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Md., and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. It is done at the CDC's high-security labs, the only place in the United States where smallpox is kept.

Smallpox is thought to have killed more people than any other infection in human history, including the Black Death in the Middle Ages. In the 20th Century alone, it took at least 500 million lives.

"We have to do the research, because the risk is so monumental," says Dr. Craig E. Smith, a bioterrorism expert at Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital in Albany, Ga.

Despite the uniquely rampant way it spreads through the air and kills, some of the internal workings of smallpox are similar to other viruses. So scientists reason that antiviral drugs already on the market for other uses might stop smallpox, just as one antibiotic can kill many kinds of bacteria.

They discovered five years ago that a drug used for an AIDS complication could kill the smallpox virus in lab cultures. The drug, called cidofovir or Vistide, is used to treat eye infections caused by cytomegalovirus, which can afflict people with HIV-weakened immune defenses.

But the drug has a drawback: It must be given by injection, which could slow its use in an emergency. So scientists have tested other drugs, including some still in early development or that failed against their intended targets.

Dr. Peter Jahrling, who heads the Army's smallpox research, said the most potent are cidofovir and five similar compounds that can be given in pill form, along with 15 others that attack the virus in different ways. So far, all seem reasonably safe.

Other possible candidates have come to the Army's attention since Sept. 11 and the anthrax attacks. "Big pharma is banging down our doors saying they've got things to test," says Jahrling. "Maybe it's patriotism or maybe it's because they see a market."

He predicts that within five years, they will identify two drugs to treat smallpox by completely different biological means.

Jahrling hopes to begin testing cidofovir next spring on monkeys at CDC. Recently, his team proved that macaque monkeys can fall ill from human smallpox, which previously was thought only to harm people. Researchers used a strain of the virus isolated in India in 1964, the same one the Russians turned into a biological weapon.

People catch smallpox by breathing the virus, but monkeys get sick only if they get a large injected dose. The animals also die within a week, which is much faster than people succumb. However, Jahrling hopes to fine-tune the strain of virus and the infection strategy so their disease more closely mimics the human variety.

Since smallpox treatments cannot be tested in infected people, the researchers hope to use monkeys. Otherwise, testing must be done with related microbes, such as the monkey pox virus, that naturally target animals.

Researchers have also developed a 20-minute test for smallpox infection. In monkeys, the results are positive within a day of the animals' exposure.

In addition, scientists are poring over the virus's genes to understand how the strains vary. The CDC has 461 samples and is concentrating on 45. Scientists have deciphered the genes of eight of them.

As viruses go, smallpox is a complicated one with nearly 200 genes. With the information gathered so far, scientists will know quickly if a terrorist attack involves a virus that has been genetically modified to make it even more dangerous. But they are just beginning to unravel the genes' workings.

"There are lots of secrets yet to be discovered there," says the CDC's Dr. James LeDuc.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Just as anthrax proved more treatable than Doctors had imagined, it will be interesting to see if one of the new antivirals makes smallpox less of a killer.
1 posted on 11/21/2001 2:55:42 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dawn53
There was a story here locally that Eli Lilly had loaned, without charge, scientists and anti-cancer drugs to the government to see if they would work against smallpox. I believe this is an all-out effort by both the government and private reasearch. Glad to see they are planning ahead!
2 posted on 11/21/2001 3:03:19 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
And to think I keep seeing Freepers all over insisting the HIV/anti-viral drug research is just wasted money. And useless investment for gov't funding.

Maybe God does work in mysterious ways.

3 posted on 11/21/2001 3:04:33 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
I'm a strong believer in the power of antivirals. I contracted chicken pox at the age of 41 from my son, who was six at the time.

Since he had had the chicken pox, the minute I saw a blister, I ran to the Doc and was put on an antiviral. My case of chicken pox ran it's course in 4 days, as opposed to weeks, had I not been on an antiviral.

4 posted on 11/21/2001 3:14:50 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
What the goverment and pharmaceuticals don't want the public to know---is that something as simple as colloidial silver--may be the answer to smallpox,hiv/aids and anthrax-and probably most frightening to them all--is that CS can be made at home in minutes ...for just a few pennies on the dollar.

Now ..lets just see if anyone connected with the FDA or AMA-posts a reply to mine-stating that CS will cause a person's skin to turn slate grey-a condition known as Argyria-it is the typical argument used to de-bunk CS-and it's totally bogus-the woman they use as an example...was given colloidial silver protein-which will cause argyria.

The problem with CS in regards to the drug companies-is that it falls into the category of natural substances that can't be patented-however--lobbiests for the drug manufacturers have managed to convince the FDA-that CS can no longer be sold publicly-but individuals can make it at home.

CS kills over 650 different assorted nasties--including mutated super-bugs--in 5-6 minutes flat-if the use of CS became widespread--drug companies and the health care industry- would stand to lose billions of dollars a month--can't have that-can we?

5 posted on 11/21/2001 3:40:42 AM PST by TongRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Smallpox List
Indexing
6 posted on 11/21/2001 4:11:26 AM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
Bump. Thanks for a very interesting article.
7 posted on 11/21/2001 5:24:27 AM PST by Artist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
The only problem is the damned FDA regulators. The FDA under Kessler clamped down on "off label" use of drugs. None of the new antiviral drugs has every been tested against smallpox in humans. Therefore you can't prove them safe and effective. The old regulatory paradigms don't work for bioterrorism. Considering how bad smallpox is, the FDA should not be too worried about safety. Treatments will have to be made on the basis of tests en vitro and in animals since fortunately no one gets smallpox naturally anymore. The animal studies will have limitations since variola does not cause such a serious disease in other species.
8 posted on 11/21/2001 8:38:10 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson