Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taliban asks UN for help to surrender
The Independent [U.K.] ^ | 21 November 2001 | Justin Huggler

Posted on 11/20/2001 5:16:41 PM PST by Silly

The Taliban have pleaded formally with the United Nations to arrange the unconditional surrender of their forces besieged inside the northern Afghan city of Kunduz. However, the top UN envoy for Afghanistan said the UN had no presence on the ground, "and simply cannot unfortunately accede to this request".

Lakhdar Brahimi said a religious leader and another unidentified person formally approached the UN in Islamabad on Monday night saying that Taliban commanders from inside Kunduz wanted to surrender unconditionally and wanted to do it to the UN.

He said the UN secretary general Kofi Annan had been in touch with the Northern Alliance, whose forces are outside the city, and members of the international coalition, asking that they "respect their obligations under international humanitarian law and treat this question with as much humanity as possible".

Thousands of Taliban troops are trapped in and around Kunduz, their every possible means of escape cut off by the Northern Alliance troops who surround them. Among them, say Alliance commanders, are 1,000 members of Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'ida network and more than 10,000 foreign Taliban volunteers who appear determined to fight to the death.

Anxious to avoid a bloodbath, the Alliance is holding back from attacking the city while it tries to help negotiate the Taliban's surrender. But grim tales come out of the city of the foreigners massacring Afghan Taliban who try to defect.

The United States has pulled the rug out from under the negotiators' feet, saying it would vehemently oppose any solution that would allow the al-Qa'ida fighters to escape. The US Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, on Monday told reporters he would prefer the al-Qa'ida fighters to be killed, rather than to be allowed to escape alive from Afghanistan.

Taliban commanders inside Kunduz have reportedly said that the foreign fighters are prepared to surrender if they are given a UN guarantee of safe passage from Afghanistan. But Mr Rumsfeld said he would do everything he could to prevent them being allowed to leave Afghanistan. "My preference is that they will either be killed or taken prisoner," he said.

As many as 470 Afghan Taliban are said to have been killed in three separate alleged incidents in the past five days.

"I am not optimistic that the foreigners will surrender," General Mohammed Daud of the Northern Alliance said yesterday. He said 20,000 Taliban still remain in Kunduz, more than 10,000 of them foreigners. The 1,000 al-Qa'ida fighters include a senior commander of the network, Omar al-Khatab, he claimed.

American planes are pounding the Taliban in and around Kunduz, but on the front lines the Northern Alliance guns remain silent. The Alliance has Kunduz surrounded on all sides. To the west are the forces of the Uzbek warlord General Rashid Dostum, whose victory in Mazar-i-Sherif prompted the collapse of the Taliban across Afghanistan. To the east are an array of warlord's private armies, under the command of General Daud.

The Alliance has not attacked, General Daud said yesterday, because it wants to avoid "widespread bloodshed and destruction".

It is not only the blood of the Taliban he is worried about. Last week, Northern Alliance troops walked into a Taliban ambush, fooled by false reports that the Taliban in Kunduz had surrendered. More than 50 soldiers were killed, according to one commander.

The Alliance's sensational victories across Afghanistan have been on the back of defections by Afghan Taliban who saw which way the wind was blowing. Many of the Alliance troops now besieging Kunduz were Taliban a week ago.

If the last of the Taliban put up a serious defence of Kunduz, the battle could be far bloodier than anything yet seen. The Americans may be eager for the al-Qa'ida fighters to be killed or captured, but the Northern Alliance are far from eager to walk into the lion's den on America's behalf.

With the Taliban's rule in Afghanistan all but consigned to history, already there are signs of cracks in the loose alliance of warlords that toppled them – even between the different commanders besieging Kunduz. General Dostum said yesterday that two senior Taliban commanders were travelling to Mazar to negotiate with him. General Daud denied it. General Daud is a member of the ethnic Tajik-dominated hardcore of the Northern Alliance once led by Ahmad Shah Massood, who are calling the shots at the moment because it was they who walked into Mazar. Usually General Dostum would be a far more powerful warlord than General Daud. Already, the warlords are jostling for position.

The easy collapse of the Taliban has shown how few Afghans were ideologically committed to their fundamentalist rule. The former Taliban now manning Northern Alliance front lines are in it strictly for themselves.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 11/20/2001 5:16:41 PM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Silly
"U.N. Surrender HELP line? We need help."

"Sir, it's as easy as admitting you have a problem and putting your hands in the air."

2 posted on 11/20/2001 5:17:57 PM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
Thank you, Drudge, for the headline. The link to the co.uk website sure was slow, though...
3 posted on 11/20/2001 5:19:31 PM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Silly
No mercy for these terrorist bastards. Hopefully the same happens to the KLA, NLA, ALA and the UCK.
4 posted on 11/20/2001 5:20:16 PM PST by Andy from Beaverton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
The Taliban have been told by President Bush what is required of them. They are now to comply or die. "Timeout" is not on the list of approved options.
5 posted on 11/20/2001 5:22:26 PM PST by atafak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
Taliban commanders from inside Kunduz wanted to surrender unconditionally and wanted to do it to the UN.

You want to surrender, Mr. Taliban? YOU surrender to US, not the UN. LOSERS!

6 posted on 11/20/2001 5:22:38 PM PST by Lizzy W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

What part of "Anyone who helps bin Laden will be destroyed outright" didn't you understand?

Geez, they might as well call for a "time out."

7 posted on 11/20/2001 5:22:57 PM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly

"Is this the Taliban? Sorry. No quarter to be given. Happy Ramadan."


8 posted on 11/20/2001 5:23:02 PM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
Kill em all. To hell with negotiation.
9 posted on 11/20/2001 5:23:05 PM PST by Roebucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
My friends from Cantor Fitzgerald didn't get a chance to surrender.

Eat lead, bastards.

10 posted on 11/20/2001 5:23:13 PM PST by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
Obviously there are many differences between us and the people of Afghanistan, but this major. Can you imagine an American EVER switching sides in a war? There may be an instance or 2 in the last 100 years, but certainly nothing on a scale as we are seeing from these people. This lack of cause in a people bothers me...but they probably don't care.
11 posted on 11/20/2001 5:25:05 PM PST by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
Today, Rumsfeld says he wants them all dead. He does not want them to escape and infect the rest of the world.
12 posted on 11/20/2001 5:25:13 PM PST by scouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Silly
Remember when they said that the UN was the enemy- that they would fight UN if they came to Afghanistan?

Sheesh. They'll likely just shoot any UN that approaches who wishes to accept "surrender". We know what happens when taliban surrender; they explode.

Daisy cutters and B52 will be over Kunduz for weeks.

13 posted on 11/20/2001 5:25:35 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
I agree with Secretary Rumsfield.You let these guys walk away and they will return another day to fight us again.They were stupid enough to get into this mess we ought to just bury them on Kanduz mountain under a blistering barrage of carpet bombing.
14 posted on 11/20/2001 5:26:41 PM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight; scouse
This lack of cause in a people bothers me...but they probably don't care.

I think they are just plain afraid to die. Remember the line from "Ronin"? A guy asks De Niro, "Are you trying to save your skin?" He says, "Yeah, it covers my body."

And scouse, I totally agree with Rumsfeld.

15 posted on 11/20/2001 5:27:44 PM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: scouse
That is the only thing terrorists understand. Anything else will be seen as a weakness. We cannot use our value judgements in this situation. Rumsfeld knows exactly what needs to be done and he's doing it. God bless him!!
16 posted on 11/20/2001 5:29:41 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Silly
Make them watch the videos of 9/11 and as they watch we should cut off their arms and legs. The hatred I feel for the taleban can not be controlled anymore.
17 posted on 11/20/2001 5:30:06 PM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
What a mess! Reminds me of my favorite tattoo: KILL'EM ALL & LET GOD SORT IT OUT
18 posted on 11/20/2001 5:31:41 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
What would Grant have said if Lee had wanted to surrender to the British and French observers? They are casting about for world leftists to bail them out of the hole they have dug. They want to leave with the cream of their terrorist fighters.

They are so afraid of their own conduct and desireous of continuing it that they fail to recognize they would suffer less in our hands than in the hands of the Northern Alliance. They want mercy? Talk to us--after an abject surrender.

19 posted on 11/20/2001 5:32:38 PM PST by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Silly
The "fearless" islamic warriors boast that they love death more than life. They should be celebrating their fate, not whining to the UN like a pack of schoolgirls. What's up with that?
20 posted on 11/20/2001 5:35:20 PM PST by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson