Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerLib
you'd probably be better off saying something like

Thanks for the advice, but it actually was Druids, we just don't have any proof it was Druids since all Druids are dead. Our modern neo-Druids are not real Druids.

37 posted on 11/21/2001 10:29:57 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
We have an update on the underwater site off Cuba coming up. I've asked someone else to post it. It's fascinating!!! (Any minute now!)
38 posted on 11/21/2001 10:45:06 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
...but it actually was Druids...

If you insist on holding to a seventeenth-century fiction, I guess that's your right.

...we just don't have any proof it was Druids...

But we do have proof that it wasn't, specifically that it pre-dated them by a couple of thousand years. OK, so we have proof that it wasn't them and no proof that it was and you still want to say they did it. Man, if I'm ever charged with a crime that I didn't commit, I do NOT want you on my jury!!!

40 posted on 11/21/2001 11:06:54 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson