Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
3195BC, Stonehenge constructed

I'm impressed. I hadn't realized wood fragments from the construction had been recovered.

25 posted on 11/20/2001 2:27:43 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
"I'm impressed. I hadn't realized wood fragments from the construction had been recovered."

I'm not sure that they have. I have 'the/my' list of tree ring 'event' dates and anytime I see a date that correlates, I write it on that list, mainly as a reference to myself. I don't remember the source of that date for the construction of Stonehenge. It may or may not be supported by tree ring data, I'll see if I can clarify that.

27 posted on 11/20/2001 2:39:15 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
"I'm impressed. I hadn't realized wood fragments from the construction had been recovered.:

It looks like I've picked up that date from dendrochronologist Mike Baillie and he does not connect it to tree ring data either. I suspect he has just conveniently 'grabbed' it from someone else just like I did from him.

35 posted on 11/20/2001 10:14:09 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson