Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN STAR FLASHES HER THIN SKIN
New York Post, Page Six ^ | November 20, 2001 | Richard Johnson

Posted on 11/20/2001 6:38:00 AM PST by Amore

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Amore
Television journalist? Isn't that a contradiction in terms? There is no such thing. Is John Tesh a "television journalist"? Why not, I say! He's as good looking as any of them, got a deep voice, and he can play the keyboard too. Remember, a week or two ago, some British newspaper article posted here referred to one of our blow dry heroes as a "news reader"? I recommend reading Tunku Varadarajan's columns instead of watching these pretty faces.
41 posted on 11/20/2001 7:19:38 AM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: coteblanche
Well, let me be the lone ( I know I will be) voice in saying I think Amanpour is a top-notch journalist.

She's great at reporting Arab and Muslim propaganada while seeming to be balanced. If that's the measure of a top-notch journalist, then she is a fine one.

43 posted on 11/20/2001 7:27:16 AM PST by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: coteblanche
Well, let me be the lone ( I know I will be) voice in saying I think Amanpour is a top-notch journalist.

I won't start a flame war here. Instead, I would ask you to support your opinion with examples showing her "top-notch" ability.

44 posted on 11/20/2001 7:27:18 AM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bungle
Thanks for the link. I had forgotten about that. We all need reminders.
45 posted on 11/20/2001 7:33:17 AM PST by Texas Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Amore
I note the comment of one John Doyle of Canada's Globe and Mail. He defended the war person lady and said feminists are furious. The Globe and Mail- ah sad,sad, in the light of what it once was. Now filled with well disguised politically correct propaganda. Oh well, I will try to mend fences and praise the war person lady. Ahem(clearing throat in Edwardian rhetorical style). I hold it that she is about to rival one of the most authoritative and informative journalists of Television of all time. (Loud voiced declamation next). Walter Cronkite What could be more sublime praise than that?
46 posted on 11/20/2001 7:33:45 AM PST by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amore
BTTT
47 posted on 11/20/2001 7:36:49 AM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amore
I understand that the braver souls at CNN can rappel down the side of the building using only Christine's underarm hair!
48 posted on 11/20/2001 7:38:19 AM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amore
Amy Kellog has been the best, IMO...plus she is really cute, unlike Herman Munster Amanpour.
49 posted on 11/20/2001 7:42:27 AM PST by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amore
"rankled feminists." This is a good thing.
50 posted on 11/20/2001 7:48:03 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Remember, a week or two ago, some British newspaper article posted here referred to one of our blow dry heroes as a "news reader"?

That is what Brits call all of their television news "talent." Only in America do our news readers (Brokaw, Jennings and Rather) profess to be "journalists."

51 posted on 11/20/2001 7:48:55 AM PST by seamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: Amore
Walter Isaacson denied she is a second-rate diva of parachute journalism. That's because he knows she's FOURTH-RATE!

Boos for the war slut :o)

54 posted on 11/20/2001 7:52:29 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amore
I don't care what she looks like I think she's an a-hole and I never watch her,as for gassy banfield who cares .
55 posted on 11/20/2001 7:52:56 AM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Ashleigh Banfield disgusts me. I will never forget her grabbing WTC survivors as they emerged and shoving her microphone in their faces. Sensing she was running out of fresh questions she asked one poor gentleman, "So, what was it like inside, did you see any bodies? Did you have to step over any bodies in order to get out?"

Besides, those glasses are just so...so..."I don't really wear glasses but don't they make me look fashionably smart?"...hideous...

She needs to just go away...

56 posted on 11/20/2001 7:59:13 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: coteblanche
"An intelligent woman with a bias beats out a ditz any day in my book."

I guess that makes sense if you're going to date her. But otherwise, I think the former is a lot more dangerous than the latter. The fact that someone is "a ditz" would be more readily apparent to the average less than fully informed, viewer than would the bias.

57 posted on 11/20/2001 8:00:08 AM PST by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: dep
now if ms. amanpour would provide the recipe of how she got her husband to lactate, in that he's the one home with their infant.

Liberals of Jamie's stripe have no trouble with lactation. It's part of the PC/feminist "Sensitive Guy" syndrome. Other well-known lactating liberals are Alec Baldwin, Phil Donahue, Mr. Streisand (can't think of his male name), Alan Alda, ad nauseum.

59 posted on 11/20/2001 8:11:49 AM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears
Christianne Imawhore has always been my favorite. She's a solid 10 if Chelsea is considered a 9???
60 posted on 11/20/2001 8:14:12 AM PST by bray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson