He said the deaths appeared to be at what appears to be yet more cold-blooded executions of journalists going about their work.
What a low life.
Two of his own reporters killed and he's using clinton speak!
1 posted on
11/20/2001 2:55:30 AM PST by
mdittmar
To: mdittmar
Heard shortly after the tribute, "...well, there's plenty more where they came from, isn't there?"
2 posted on
11/20/2001 2:57:16 AM PST by
mgc1122
To: mdittmar
I wonder if Reuters will continue their "objective and unbiased" reporting after this.......nah.
To: mdittmar
What shockingly biased commentary on this even. Reuters, to show its neutrality, should avoid loaded terms like cruel, senseless, a terrible waste or comment that their deaths also make us angry, outraged at what appears to be yet more cold-blooded executions.
A truly objective reporter would have termed this activity what it is: that several persons employed by news organizations met with an unknown group of people on a road in Afghanistan and, after a disagreement, died due to unknown causes not believed to be natural.
To: mdittmar
finally! some of the REAL enemy being killed.
9 posted on
11/20/2001 3:25:21 AM PST by
rickmoe
To: mdittmar
Executed? You forget that Reuters is opposed to capital punishment. Why, the Taliban who killed their reporters are almost as bad as Texas Governor Bush used to be. There now, you see why we should put an end to capital punishment in America.
12 posted on
11/20/2001 4:28:04 AM PST by
Cicero
To: mdittmar
Reuters is being extremely racist and homophobic. These men weren't executed, they were simply aborted in a procedure known in Afghanistan as "post-birth abortion". There was no crime committed and no one was killed as a result. There was just some tissue removed.
Back in the real world, its always a tragedy when people are murdered and my sympathies are with their families.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson